Gun Control & RKBA

oneshooter

(8,614 posts) Sun Mar 29, 2015, 11:30 AM Mar 2015

Brady Bunch LOSES AGAIN [View all]

Lost another lawsuit against the ammo dealers. If they don't appeal they pay all legal defense fees, if the lose the appeal, they pay for that defense costs also.
Hope they have deep pockets.

https://www.firearmspolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/gov.uscourts.cod_.151625.45.0.pdf

80 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brady Bunch LOSES AGAIN [View all] oneshooter Mar 2015 OP

Oh... a slam against poor James Brady and his foundation... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #1

Not disparaging his memory, GGJohn Mar 2015 #3

...the org that was formed by him and his wife. Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #4

No, it's not the same thing. GGJohn Mar 2015 #10

No, it's the same thing in this case... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #13

No, it's not the same thing in this case. eom. GGJohn Mar 2015 #15

It is. eom. Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #16

Which has what to do with this thread? GGJohn Mar 2015 #17

The org is the man... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #20

Maybe in the early days, but not now. GGJohn Mar 2015 #22

Sarah's was still in charge of it as of 2 years ago. Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #24

All fine and dandy, and I commend her for taking care of her husband, GGJohn Mar 2015 #29

Interesting read Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #56

actually, they didn't start the organization gejohnston Mar 2015 #23

Game, set, match. pablo_marmol Mar 2015 #75

No...it's not. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #25

Somewhere, I can't remember where... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #69

In fact, I have... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #70

good enough for CU, good enough for the Brady Campaign discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #71

The organization wasn't formed by Brady and his wife... S_B_Jackson Mar 2015 #80

His foundation is waging a useless cultural war that motivates Republican voters krispos42 Mar 2015 #5

That is my opinion. Yes. Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #6

Seriously? The group is immune from criticsm? NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #28

Yeah... sorry I waded into this well-known morass... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #35

Then when there are other opinions, you can't be surprised by them. krispos42 Mar 2015 #32

Not surprised... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #36

The Brady people... krispos42 Mar 2015 #65

I always wonder ... DonP Mar 2015 #67

IDK, But they even sale their mailing list to raise funds.. virginia mountainman Mar 2015 #78

seriously? Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #43

This group is unique, as it was started because of a gun crime... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #45

I think you meant "strayed" Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #50

Ooh... I made a typo! Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #53

thank you Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #55

Heehee! Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #57

just accepting what you said Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #59

..even when sarcastic? Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #60

I do when it is good and Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #61

I only use that when my sarcasm isn't obvious... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #62

Nice Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #63

Your thought that it was a personal insult... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #64

Staying classy..in the eyes of the NRA anyway. Maybe not so much in the eyes of DU TOS? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #9

Yep... Cooley Hurd Mar 2015 #11

Yet some DU denizens insist they are liberals and hate the NRA - but love all their positions? Paradox. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #12

Also a paradox: "Progressives" that support a billionaire that works against Democrats friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #18

Ad hominem. Boring. So what do you think of my comments about the NRA? Any NRA positions you dislike? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #19

I note you managed not to name any of those purported DUers who 'support NRA positions' friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #26

Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #48

That is clear enough, thanks! Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #68

Nice non-answer Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #72

You don't seem to do much here but accuse others of not being Dems... Inkfreak Mar 2015 #30

And those that challenge him, he puts on ignore. eom. GGJohn Mar 2015 #34

or he runs away Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #51

DU has always had a certain number of self-appointed "purity police"... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #39

Well then Mr. Fred Sanders, GGJohn Mar 2015 #14

Which TOS does it violate? NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #33

Nope, fair game. VScott Mar 2015 #66

Here's a story... Puha Ekapi Mar 2015 #79

But I thought the tide was turning? GGJohn Mar 2015 #2

That deep pocket the bullet put in Brady's head must be pretty amusing to some, too. nt Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2015 #7

Ronnie Reagan also got shot in the same incident. How much leeway should *he* have been given? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #21

You believe gun control supporters are okay with, or make an exception for, Reagan being shot? Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2015 #38

I didn't give Reagan a break. If Brady had enough agency to run his org... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #49

I am sure Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #8

"unless Bloomberg puts in some of his billions." NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #41

Making fun of a shooting victim. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2015 #27

Really? GGJohn Mar 2015 #31

Don't be obtuse. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2015 #37

Not being obtuse, just asking you to point out here who's making fun GGJohn Mar 2015 #44

No, they can not Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #52

I noticed that NONE of the posters had anything to say about the post itself. oneshooter Mar 2015 #42

How many of the "outraged" laid off Reagan after HE got shot in the same incident? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #46

Most gun control proponents are all talk and no action, GGJohn Mar 2015 #47

well, look the proposed ammo ban Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #54

From the ruling: NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #40

I hope it is the lawyers that pay Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #58

Well, the lawyers and the Brady Campaign. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #73

Good decision, but I don't see the Brady Campaign listed on that document petronius Mar 2015 #74

Works for this Democrat! pablo_marmol Mar 2015 #76

So the Brady Campaign sued to prevent *anybody* from buying ammo or magazines online... benEzra Mar 2015 #77