......gun restriction proponents would be driven to educate themselves on all things relating to gun violence. They are not.
They would be intensely interested in what liberal criminologists who disagree with what completely ignorant talking heads have to say. They are not.
They would stop and scratch their heads upon discovering that gun violence has been dropping sharply while the number of the nation's guns has been increasing. They do not.
They would speak less. And read more. They would taunt less. And read more. They would sneer less. And read more.
They wouldn't be interested in the least about what "guns are designed to do" -- as they would recognize the obvious -- that emotion-baiting questions like this distract from more intelligent questions, such as: "How can we reduce the number of firearms that end up in criminal hands?" Or...."What are the holes in law enforcement data sharing that result in tragedies?"
They would actually be able to define what an "assault weapon" is. And once they could.....they would recognize that the angst surrounding these rifles is unfounded, and discontinue support for assinine bans.
They wouldn't lie about "bans" on research......then proceed to ignore what the researchers say when it conflicts with their talking points.
They wouldn't be solely focused on restricting guns as a "solution" to gun violence.
The list is truly endless.