Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
Wed Jul 22, 2015, 08:50 PM Jul 2015

Those who would prefer to be unarmed during an active shooter scenario, raise your hands. [View all]

If you'd rather be unarmed during an active shooter event, please, sound off here.


Explain your logic for us.


As for me, I fall into the 'I'd rather be armed' category, if I had the bad fortune of an active shooter event happening in my immediate proximity.

149 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obviously I personally would rather be armed. darkangel218 Jul 2015 #1
It's always wise to be armed. ileus Jul 2015 #2
I would much prefer to be unarmed because I am certain that all of the guillaumeb Jul 2015 #3
+1 villager Jul 2015 #5
Notice that those who respond thus far that they would rather be armed- notadmblnd Jul 2015 #7
Its because the OP was directed at people who would choose not to. beevul Jul 2015 #10
Well it is not obvious to me why one would prefer to be armed notadmblnd Jul 2015 #11
Not what this thread is about. beevul Jul 2015 #14
so your topic is if you don't want to carry a gun I think you are illogical? luvspeas Jul 2015 #80
Nope. beevul Jul 2015 #87
I would prefer to be armed TeddyR Jul 2015 #15
So how would you feel if you killed someone notadmblnd Jul 2015 #18
Not sure I understand your question TeddyR Jul 2015 #25
I was asking how you would feel if you opened fire on a person you mistakely thought notadmblnd Jul 2015 #27
Would not the active shooter be the one actually *shooting* at unarmed people? friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #33
You tell me notadmblnd Jul 2015 #37
I would take this far more seriously if you could cite a real-life example of such a thing happening friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #42
Why would I have to cite anything? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #46
I would feel horrible if I shot *anyone*, even if they were actively trying to do harm friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #62
Ah, the gun controllers favorite fantasy DonP Jul 2015 #50
Perhaps you need to read further down before you make assumptions? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #55
We've given real-life examples. You've given citation-free theory n/t friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #69
I think he/she is referring to the implication of being anti-gun. beevul Jul 2015 #76
I haven't made any claims and I haven't given any theory. notadmblnd Jul 2015 #86
The best thing do do is get away from the scene Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #95
Whoa there fella. beevul Jul 2015 #39
So I shot the guy TeddyR Jul 2015 #36
or of you were shooting the bad guy and hit an innocent person trying to flee? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #41
I imagine I'd feel TeddyR Jul 2015 #48
I would like to think that I wouldn't be standing idly by either. notadmblnd Jul 2015 #85
I don't run sarisataka Jul 2015 #21
So are you involved in active shooter events often? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #23
I haven't had anyone shoot sarisataka Jul 2015 #24
I do not think that they realize that the movies are fantasy. eom guillaumeb Jul 2015 #13
Please cite the part of the OP,where I say how I would respond if armed, to an active shooter event. beevul Jul 2015 #26
Here is/was your original post: guillaumeb Jul 2015 #109
No. Sorry. beevul Jul 2015 #110
As I further explained in my response to you when I said: guillaumeb Jul 2015 #111
See, that really ends it. beevul Jul 2015 #112
Someone is confused here. guillaumeb Jul 2015 #113
Yes, someone is, but its not me. beevul Jul 2015 #127
Yeah, in the NOrthern Illinois massacre a few years ago, the shooter walked into a 120-student Doctor_J Jul 2015 #28
"Think of how much better it would have turned out if all 120 students had opened fire." friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #30
So are you ok TeddyR Jul 2015 #51
Or the massacre in the grammar school. guillaumeb Jul 2015 #108
I would rather be in a gun free zone Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #4
I would prefer to be unarmed notadmblnd Jul 2015 #6
Interesting. beevul Jul 2015 #12
nope, there are guns in my house right now notadmblnd Jul 2015 #16
Ok. Thank you. beevul Jul 2015 #19
I can only see two reasons for wanting to go through life armed. notadmblnd Jul 2015 #29
Fortunately, you are free to go through life unarmed friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #35
if I were to be armed and opened fire to feed my ego by thinking I could save the day. gejohnston Jul 2015 #32
"I would if I were be involved in an airplane crash" Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #40
I never claimed anyone was obligated to disarm notadmblnd Jul 2015 #44
i'd rather be unarmed. unblock Jul 2015 #8
"the odds of me successfully using it..." Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #45
"controllers", haha! unblock Jul 2015 #73
"Controller" is the sobriquet for those who want gun control without actual regard Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #78
yeah, like i said, your meaning i got. unblock Jul 2015 #82
It's a disturbing sight to watch as Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #90
Thats a dose of reality right there... beevul Jul 2015 #93
i won't alert, i've taken threads on tangents myself from time to time. unblock Jul 2015 #114
FWIW, I wasn't referring to you. beevul Jul 2015 #129
I'm impressed SecularMotion Jul 2015 #115
You're claiming NRA is drawing its talking points from the Controllers here at DU? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #116
Here's your chance to prove my post is wrong -- Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #117
Here you go SecularMotion Jul 2015 #118
Seeing as my post had absolutely 0 NRA talking points not 1 of those "facts" relates to my post. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #119
The honorable thing to do would be to withdraw your accusation since none of the points you Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #120
You're entitled to your opinion. SecularMotion Jul 2015 #121
You're not entitled to deliberately spread falsehoods. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #122
See post #121 SecularMotion Jul 2015 #123
Hiding behind silly non-posts doesn't show where any of my points in any way mirror the NRAs Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #124
Thats not an opinion, SecMo, its a fact. N/T beevul Jul 2015 #130
I'll go with odds safeinOhio Jul 2015 #9
I hope to never be there TeddyR Jul 2015 #20
"Always zig then zag when you run." Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #34
Unless you can shoot on the run, safeinOhio Jul 2015 #43
Except that's not how real life works. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #49
always zig then zag and other bad advice from movies gejohnston Jul 2015 #38
From the nyt.com safeinOhio Jul 2015 #47
Yep TeddyR Jul 2015 #53
Fatal gun accidents happen safeinOhio Jul 2015 #58
false equivlence gejohnston Jul 2015 #61
"several hundred thousand times a year" safeinOhio Jul 2015 #67
take your pick of several studies gejohnston Jul 2015 #71
CDC uses self-reported incidents safeinOhio Jul 2015 #75
actually, they did a survey of several studies gejohnston Jul 2015 #79
Would you be opposed to the CDC sarisataka Jul 2015 #83
Define 'trained police' in the context of NYC police firearms use. beevul Jul 2015 #54
the average CCW holder is better trained than NYPD gejohnston Jul 2015 #59
Many of those recent active shooters were teens or safeinOhio Jul 2015 #68
which has what to do with CCW holders or cops? gejohnston Jul 2015 #72
Here are a couple of average CCW holder safeinOhio Jul 2015 #70
one incident is not data gejohnston Jul 2015 #74
The devil is in the details though Lurks Often Jul 2015 #103
NYC police are a poor example. Straw Man Jul 2015 #125
I doubt that any of the posters expressing concern about "friendly fire" incidents... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #17
Yeah TeddyR Jul 2015 #22
As you've seen, there are several Friends of Fred (Colon) posting in this thread: friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #31
Jeebus H Christ pkdu Jul 2015 #96
I believe that was the well trained NYPD with their 12lb trigger Glocks. n/t oneshooter Jul 2015 #102
Try again: "Police: All Empire State shooting victims were wounded by officers" friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #105
If I had a gun, I'd be shot first Warpy Jul 2015 #52
"Guns don't save you". Except when they do. beevul Jul 2015 #56
except when they dont pkdu Jul 2015 #97
The police being poor marksman, reflects only on police. beevul Jul 2015 #98
Oh , the " idiots with guns are better than LEO" defence...nice try pkdu Jul 2015 #99
Nope. beevul Jul 2015 #100
Looks like us 'yahoos' are better at factual accuracy than he is... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #106
So you use one instance TeddyR Jul 2015 #57
they also saved several others by gejohnston Jul 2015 #64
You just like every the talk, don't you matt819 Jul 2015 #60
"Your post just called out for a response." An intelligent one would have been better. YMMV... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2015 #65
i would not want have to carry a gun every place all of the time for the unlikely HFRN Jul 2015 #63
all the mass killings i remember were committed by people who purchased their guns samsingh Jul 2015 #66
so would I but that's not gonna happen discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #101
I would rather be unarmed in any circumstance... luvspeas Jul 2015 #77
Nobody said you did. beevul Jul 2015 #84
you did say just that and I don't understand your reasoning... luvspeas Jul 2015 #88
That includes, I assume, people that already own them? beevul Jul 2015 #91
"In my opinion anyone who wants to own a gun is a spineless coward" Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #92
Reminds me of a debate on twin engine WW II fighters versus single engine fighters beardown Jul 2015 #81
Saying you have a gun is considered in DGU data though some SD pros don't ... Eleanors38 Jul 2015 #107
Post removed Post removed Jul 2015 #89
I would prefer to be armed, but that doesn't mean I would return fire. Kennah Jul 2015 #94
Correct. darkangel218 Jul 2015 #104
I would be since I do not have a gun. roody Jul 2015 #126
I would rather nobody be armed. Seems the most logical option for a civilized society. AllFieldsRequired Jul 2015 #128
A civilized society of people regarded as children, perhaps. beevul Jul 2015 #132
I am not sure I understand your response. Are you saying that it would be childish AllFieldsRequired Jul 2015 #134
I don't know how civilized society is or is not but Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #135
Nope. beevul Jul 2015 #136
civilized and uncivilized are value judgements, gejohnston Jul 2015 #139
Only if genuinely, universally civilized. Lizzie Poppet Aug 2015 #149
I seem to remember zipplewrath Jul 2015 #131
Oh yea-... deathrind Jul 2015 #133
EVERYONE DIES!!! PERIOD sanatanadharma Jul 2015 #137
"Any list of purported gun-saves-stories needs to be placed along side a list..." beevul Jul 2015 #138
If everyone dies repeatedly and pays their karmic debt, what's the big deal? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #142
Now there's a different item n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #144
LOL, nice timing. Classy as usual. nt Logical Jul 2015 #140
Meaning what, exactly? beevul Jul 2015 #141
Oh, come on! Of course you should have known. Was it really that hard to predict? stone space Aug 2015 #148
I would definitely prefer to be armed but that's not happening discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #143
Well since apparently my family has found themselves on some idiots kill list, too AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #145
To avoid escalation. Starboard Tack Jul 2015 #146
only one person has a choice about attending gejohnston Jul 2015 #147
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Those who would prefer to...»Reply #0