Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Recap of a post in GD [View all]

AndyS

(14,559 posts)
34. Yeah, right, all the car safety stuff was available just waiting to be voluntarily adopted . . .
Thu Apr 8, 2021, 11:06 AM
Apr 2021

Nice try but both seat belts and airbags are both federally mandated and neither one became 'standard' until federally mandated.

Title 49 of the United States Code, Chapter 301, Motor Safety Standard, which took effect on January 1, 1968, that required all vehicles (except buses) to be fitted with seat belts in all designated seating positions

On September 1, 1998, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 finally goes into effect. The law required that all cars and light trucks sold in the United States have air bags on both sides of the front seat.


You said you didn't object to RF smart guns when actually you did in this excerpt from the 2016 post.
“The unlocking mechanism for "smart guns" is inherently unreliable. If that's not "serious" enough for you, then perhaps you could tell me what is. “
This is where the goal posts got moved. The original stance was that ALL smart guns are unreliable. Now it's shifted to Biometric smart guns are unreliable. RF guns are reliable but still not good because a 'bad guy' could steal both gun and activator which is somehow worse than stealing just a dumb gun??

You tell me that 'several states' have reliability standards for guns. I hate to ask this 'cause it is so close to the 'link please' crap we both run into in these exchanges. It's usually nothing more than a diversion and a veiled slight at the integrity of the poster. However I am genuinely interested in this and would like to see what states have done to impose any standard on guns. Wikipedia lists regulations by state but not a single one applies to the gun itself. So, if you could help me out with at least one state setting standards for reliability or safety I'd appreciate it. I'm not being snide, I'm genuinely interested in all aspects of this topic.

As to reliability. I appreciate your dissertation on the topic but have to disagree. Reliability is NOT subjective. CAFE standards are not subjective. Feces content of ground beef is not subjective. NONE of the things we measure are subjective. It's NOT complicated, we measure and test reliability of all sorts of things every day. 'Real world' reliability is NOT different, otherwise why bother to test at all if it doesn't apply outside the lab? That whole 'semi autos are reliable except for the magazines' thing! That's like saying the electric car is reliable except that every 250th battery explodes and burns the whole thing down.

So I ask again, if every 250th time you touched an electric appliance you were shocked would you find that acceptable? Particularly when you apparently believe that this thing is vital to your survival? Is failing every 250 times you need it acceptable?

I saw the Armitix magnet video too. Guy holding the gun in his right hand, left hand crossed over to the right side of the gun holding the magnet near it. Yeah, that's a scary thought! You'll encounter someone strong enough to take the gun away from you and he has the right size magnet and knows where to place it while in a fight or flight conflict!!!! You stay up late at night over that scenario? This is somehow worse than having your dumb gun taken and pointed at you without a magnet held awkwardly near it?

And lastly: “I mean, your side is REALLY GOOD at getting new firearms made and sold!” It's not 'my side' (I had thought we were both on the side of reducing violent death but maybe not?) that sells guns. It is the gun industry that stokes fear and angst in, I guess, 'your side'? Fear sells guns. Fear of other people with guns, fear of 'the other', fear that the boogy man will take them away, fear the Government will be tyrannical, fear of change and fear of Democrats. FEAR that for some reason people who want guns are particularly susceptible to.

I don't care if having a Democrat in office scares gunners. They're not going to vote D anyway, so fuck 'em. Stop coddling the silly bastards. They're afraid I'll take their guns away? So be it, they will vote that way be it true or not so just YEAH take the damn things away.

The gun industry has left reasonable people no choice.


Recap of a post in GD [View all] AndyS Mar 2021 OP
Here is my question... TheRealNorth Mar 2021 #1
No, I'm not. AndyS Mar 2021 #2
Did you not recently say you were open to prohibiting ownership of revolvers, pumps, and lever Dial H For Hero Mar 2021 #3
Only if after time, statistics and evaluation they AndyS Mar 2021 #4
Thank you for the clarification. Dial H For Hero Mar 2021 #5
Okay, H. Sleep tight. AndyS Mar 2021 #6
You're missing the part about the breakdown... yagotme Mar 2021 #7
Unsatisfactory discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2021 #8
I think a better question would be, yagotme Mar 2021 #9
Andy hasn't replied to one of my posts in years. discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2021 #11
Seems like I'm on ignore, also. n/t yagotme Apr 2021 #12
It's a bit of club discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2021 #13
I was blocked some time ago, for asking a question. yagotme Apr 2021 #14
I wrote a reply detailing the problems with somoone's prposed draconian gun control proposal. Dial H For Hero Apr 2021 #15
Well, you disagreed with someone... yagotme Apr 2021 #17
"gangs don't count" Please show me where I said that EX500rider Mar 2021 #10
I don't exempt guns from the second point krispos42 Apr 2021 #16
"(C)an only really use one at a time." yagotme Apr 2021 #18
I've seen plenty of dual-wield movies krispos42 Apr 2021 #19
Have shot at SASS cowboy shoots, in Duelist category, yagotme Apr 2021 #20
That's one way to do it with single-action revolvers krispos42 Apr 2021 #22
If one is a good shot, and practices, yagotme Apr 2021 #33
Right. Straw Man Apr 2021 #36
Thank you again for the thoughtful reply. AndyS Apr 2021 #21
Yeah, I got interrupted krispos42 Apr 2021 #23
I remember that post. I pretty much beat you to death with your own talking points. AndyS Apr 2021 #24
You think you did. You didn't. krispos42 Apr 2021 #25
Yes, I pretty much did. AndyS Apr 2021 #26
Oh, I missed your devestating "own" krispos42 Apr 2021 #28
It's okay if you missed my points, it's a gun related affliction. AndyS Apr 2021 #29
Hmmm... making it personal now. I must be hitting a nerve. krispos42 Apr 2021 #30
I'll wait for your complete response. AndyS Apr 2021 #31
Continued! krispos42 Apr 2021 #32
Yeah, right, all the car safety stuff was available just waiting to be voluntarily adopted . . . AndyS Apr 2021 #34
Excuse the intrusion discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2021 #35
Some counter babble discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2021 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Recap of a post in GD»Reply #34