Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Friendly fire shootings show why arming everyone won’t solve gun violence [View all]
The New York City police officers who shot and killed Jeffrey Johnson near the Empire State Building last week did not know that he was a lone gunman with a vendetta against a co-worker. The incident took place close to a world-famous landmark in a city that has suffered dearly from terrorist attacks, so its not surprising that police reacted aggressively. Still, the incident, in which innocent bystanders were also shot, raises questions about whether police were too quick to assume a broader terror plot was underway and about claims by the gun lobby that having lots of armed people on the scene is the best way to stop gun violence.
The New York Police Department has admitted that all nine bystanders wounded were actually struck by bullets or fragments from two cops. This mystifying fact should result in a serious review of protocols; these officers are trained to be good shots. This was chaos in a crowded environment an environment that ought to be controlled by law enforcement. As they review the incident, investigators should determine whether any suspicions of a larger plot prompted officers to fire their weapons in ways that would endanger innocent people.
http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-31/editorials/33503371_1_gun-violence-police-officers-gun-lobby
The New York Police Department has admitted that all nine bystanders wounded were actually struck by bullets or fragments from two cops. This mystifying fact should result in a serious review of protocols; these officers are trained to be good shots. This was chaos in a crowded environment an environment that ought to be controlled by law enforcement. As they review the incident, investigators should determine whether any suspicions of a larger plot prompted officers to fire their weapons in ways that would endanger innocent people.
http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-31/editorials/33503371_1_gun-violence-police-officers-gun-lobby
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Friendly fire shootings show why arming everyone won’t solve gun violence [View all]
SecularMotion
Sep 2012
OP
I'd like it better if it didn't shill for a right wing organization on a Democratic message board.
SecularMotion
Sep 2012
#4
Pro-2A Democrats exist and there are millions of us. It's nothing new, get used to it. nt
rDigital
Sep 2012
#6
There's never a time not to carry! A few years back, one of our "pro gun progressives"
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#24
If you'd ever taken a defensive firearms class in your life you'd know the joke behind that
rDigital
Sep 2012
#8
Not quite, just laughing you out of the room for your unabashed boastfulness. Pissing contests are
rDigital
Sep 2012
#14
Yep, he was. But, don't you see, intellectual consistency is for OTHER posters. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#27
We got it-- an amateur gunslinger with proper training and a proper weapon...
TreasonousBastard
Sep 2012
#15
It also shows why the idea that "ONLY THE POLICE SHOULD HAVE GUNS" is a bunch of shit.
Atypical Liberal
Sep 2012
#18
I made a point about this truth on a Yahoo News story using the Gabrielle Giffords situation
johnlucas
Sep 2012
#19
There have been several mass shootings that were stopped by an armed citizen.
GreenStormCloud
Sep 2012
#21
Neither I nor anyone else can tell you whether the presence of one or more armed citizens
tularetom
Sep 2012
#29