Yes, as defined in the 1994 Comprehensive Assault Weapons Ban. (Reply #21)

In the discussion thread: Assault Weapon Truth [View all]

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 02:43 PM

21. Yes, as defined in the 1994 Comprehensive Assault Weapons Ban.

This is an inherently technical discussion on the firearms side, or at least, at some point in the policy discussion, the rubber language of the proposed policy has to meet the technical road upon which the laws are to be carried.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

36 replies	Author	Time	Post
Assault Weapon Truth [View all]	Douva	Jan 2013	OP
Confusion	locks	Jan 2013	#1
on average, how many people do you think are killed every day with assault weapons in America?	loknar	Jan 2013	#3
So...twenty kids in Newtown, CT were just a statistical anomaly.......	lastlib	Jan 2013	#8
how many people are killed by assault rifles every day?	loknar	Jan 2013	#10
^	lastlib	Jan 2013	#11
"That's all we need to know"	Recursion	Jan 2013	#22
I am NOT advocating for any law that keeps his gun legal. That's bullshit, and you know it.	lastlib	Jan 2013	#26
That wasn't an assault weapon	Recursion	Jan 2013	#12
I bet those kids thought it was--before they DIED!!	lastlib	Jan 2013	#19
Wow! You reminded me that kids died! That changes everything!	Recursion	Jan 2013	#20
It wouldn't be legal under MY idea of an assault-weapon ban.	lastlib	Jan 2013	#27
So tell me your idea of an assault weapon ban. I'm open to ideas	Recursion	Jan 2013	#28
if it points at you and a bullet comes out, it's an assault weapon.	lastlib	Jan 2013	#30
Ban all guns? Hasn't worked well for pot	Recursion	Jan 2013	#31
So just pure, emotional prohibitionism.	Callisto32	Jan 2013	#32
If it'll save one child's life, it works for me.	lastlib	Jan 2013	#36
Oh hey, spam link to NRA sources.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#2
You should forward this to those folks in Newtown, classes resumed today	jmg257	Jan 2013	#4
Adam Lanza did no such thing, his AR15 did it all.	loknar	Jan 2013	#5
It sure helped. After all - isn't that why we all like them so much?	jmg257	Jan 2013	#16
I think if we're talking about an AWB, it matters that his AR-15 wasn't an assault weapon	Recursion	Jan 2013	#13
If we're talking about a new AWB, it'll matter - they'll need to know how to expand the definition,	jmg257	Jan 2013	#17
Doesn't help them any, but if discussing possible policy changes, it's helpful to be accurate.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#14
Along with "assault weapons", which his rifle wasn't	Recursion	Jan 2013	#18
Yes, as defined in the 1994 Comprehensive Assault Weapons Ban.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#21
wolves in sheeps clothing?	jimmy the one	Jan 2013	#6
I love being a democrat, all except the part about having to be anti-gun.	loknar	Jan 2013	#7
Evidently you misread some of the	billh58	Jan 2013	#35
If it points at you and a bullet comes out, it's an assault weapon.	lastlib	Jan 2013	#9
So just to be clear ...	Straw Man	Jan 2013	#15
Here's a hint	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Jan 2013	#23
Did you actually look at the site?	Douva	Jan 2013	#24
Not worried	jimmy the one	Jan 2013	#25
Are you a liberal Democrat? I see your anti-2A stance (not a good start). What else?	Eleanors38	Jan 2013	#29
DU, especially the Gungeon	billh58	Jan 2013	#33
Thank you so much	billh58	Jan 2013	#34

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.