Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

National Security & Defense

Turbineguy

(40,219 posts)

5. Not entirely.

Reply to unhappycamper (Original post)

Thu Oct 2, 2014, 08:13 AM

Oct 2014

If you consider that it is part of an effort to bankrupt the U.S. while making your friends rich and getting jobs for the boys, it's something of a success.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lockheed�s F-35 Stealth Fighter: A $1.5 Trillion Waste of Tax Dollars [View all] unhappycamper Oct 2014 OP

Even if it worked, it wouldn't make us safer. Scuba Oct 2014 #1

Even if it worked. Even if it was the greatest plane of all time it would still be a bad choice. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #3

Considering the nature of the US "opponent" our current fighter force is more than adequate. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author bahrbearian Oct 2014 #4

Not entirely. Turbineguy Oct 2014 #5

It is slower less manuverable than current generation of fighter aircraft. gordianot Oct 2014 #6

That is why Lockheed won't win 6th generation fighter contract... TRoN33 Oct 2014 #7

I don't think they really cared whether it worked or not. canuckledragger Oct 2014 #8

IMO, the money could have been better spent on advanced UAV type aircraft. nt ladjf Oct 2014 #9