Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Evolution-Accepting Christian Professor: Bible Doesn’t Have to Conflict with Scientific Realities [View all]edhopper
(33,554 posts)70. Why is 14 billion years nothing to a supreme being.
You seem to know how God experiences time.
Do you think he guided evolution to create humans, if so, doesn't that mean natural processes did not shape results.
Why so many restarts in evolution? Did he make mistakes?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Evolution-Accepting Christian Professor: Bible Doesn’t Have to Conflict with Scientific Realities [View all]
rug
Jan 2015
OP
I find it problematic because it continues to insert a guiding hand into a process
cbayer
Jan 2015
#16
I'm asking you to cite your evidence that the evolutionary process cannot be chaotic.
Jim__
Jun 2015
#102
Geez, AtheistCrusader, I so wish you would participate in the discourse here beyond simple dismissal
pinto
Jan 2015
#8
I'm not sure there is a finite amount of what can be known, but that's a different subject.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#26
Por nada - the discussion is one that I really enjoy listening to so it was no burden.
eomer
Jan 2015
#92
BTW, that's apparently not the interview where he said this. It was to Bill Moyers.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#45
I think when you took his quote out of context, you presented it as his thoughts.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#37
There isn't any reason why the two can not continue to exists, if you don't believe then it is your
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#29
Ok folks, now for something completely different - Randomness and Mathematical Proof (Sci Amer)
pinto
Jan 2015
#58
Did you read any of the discussions in this thread? Or just choose a drive by post?
pinto
Jan 2015
#60
By his own admission: The belief in question is whatever the believer wants it to be.
DetlefK
Jan 2015
#62
I think that science teachers in these schools were liberal thinkers who realized that it did not
jwirr
Jan 2015
#66
Layer of ridiculous voodoo horseshit along with a dose of science-acceptance.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#96
The God of the gaps. It slices, it dices, it postpones the age of reason yet again!
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2015
#100
How did he as a scientist come to the conclusion that God belongs into this theory?
DetlefK
Jun 2015
#101
I grew up accepting both, and as such, never took the Bible literally...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2015
#110