Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:44 AM Feb 2015

~Neil DeGrasse Tyson Shows Science And Religion Can Co-Exist In ‘Cosmos’~ [View all]

The tension that seems* to exist between science and religion has possibly been aggravated by creationism and climate deniers in recent years, but it's really quite unnecessary. Only the most fundamentalist among scientists and religious leaders seem to be militant about their position to the exclusion of others.

Some of the most stimulation conversations about science involve the way it's been influenced by religion, and vice-versa. I'm fascinated by the contrasts and similarities between the science and religion. Both enterprises are sometimes at war with one another, and both involve generous helpings of "belief" and "faith", but to far different ends.

And, finally, the best minds in both fields practice "Intellectual generosity"—the willingness and ability to grasp another person's arguments and respond to them constructively.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson Shows Science And Religion Can Co-Exist In ‘Cosmos’

by Jack Jenkins Posted on March 11, 2014 at 11:35 am



Neil deGrasse Tyson has been called many things. Groundbreaking astronomer. Dynamic communicator. Sexiest astrophysicist alive.

But what about public theologian?

It might sound crazy, but the recent reboot of the television show Cosmos: A Personal Journey — Carl Sagan’s classic 1980s exploration of all things science, this time starring the charismatic Tyson and renamed “Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey” — is already attracting more attention for what it says about religion than astrophysics.

The show, which premiered Sunday night, begins roughly as expected, with Tyson guiding viewers through a humbling and special-effect laden tour of our seemingly infinite cosmos. But things abruptly shift gears as the program enters its middle segment, with Tyson narrating an animated retelling of the life of Giordano Bruno, a 14th century Dominican friar who dared to make the bold claim that our universe is not confined to the solar system (with the sun at the center), but in fact home an infinite number of suns besides our own, each surrounded by worlds populated with intelligent beings.

Predictably, Bruno’s ideas weren’t exactly popular with the religious leadership of his day. Scene after scene shows him mocked and exiled for his passionate embrace of an infinite universe, and Bruno is eventually imprisoned and tortured by the religious “thought police.” Ultimately, despite Bruno’s repeated assertion that his controversial conviction is fueled by his deep love in “the Creator,” we see him burned at the stake for his beliefs.

more deliciousness at: http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2014/03/11/3389411/degrasse-tyson-religion/
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am a true believer... chillfactor Feb 2015 #1
Because religion purports to reveal truths about the universe that aren't true. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #2
Which raises an interesting question. bvf Feb 2015 #4
We are currently facing several existential crisis, and the Bullshit Factory, which includes Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #10
Some of those religions are predicated upon a hoped-for future die-off. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #14
Wrong. Science doesn't deal in truths demwing Feb 2015 #42
Hardly. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #43
Absolutely and most people do not have difficulty with that at all. cbayer Feb 2015 #8
Yes, and our founding fathers showed that slavery could co-exist skepticscott Feb 2015 #3
You didn't read it, did you? Here, I'll grab my highlighter. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #6
Disingenuous as fuck. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #16
73% of Catholics said "No", we aren't in the end times. Not bad! NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #36
Yeah, but they're outnumbered. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #37
Yup! Hey, have you ever seen this: World Religions Tree? Giant graphic. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #38
Yawn. Yes, I know what point you THOUGHT you were making skepticscott Feb 2015 #35
Good article worth the re-read. cbayer Feb 2015 #5
When someone finds the middle ground between two camps, it pisses off the extremists... NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #7
Isn't that the truth. cbayer Feb 2015 #9
The marine mammals are so moving. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #11
The whales are all down here, but they should be passing through your region in a couple of months. cbayer Feb 2015 #13
They contradict each other... MellowDem Feb 2015 #12
I see all the place where there's concordance. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #17
You lost me edhopper Feb 2015 #15
To me, they aren't legitimate if they're stuck in their narrow POV. Good grief. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #18
"Not all religions are evil Christianity, and not all Science is right." This is a nonsensical... Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #19
I'll stick with my first post edhopper Feb 2015 #21
Science is a process, a technique for determining physical reality.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #22
Not true at all. cbayer Feb 2015 #23
Phenomenons are things that are happening in physical reality hence they are part of it Fumesucker Feb 2015 #24
Everything that we don't understand now we call supernatural. cbayer Feb 2015 #25
Gravity is supernatural? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #26
Of course you didn't know that, because it's not true. cbayer Feb 2015 #27
I've been into astronomy since I was about seven or eight Fumesucker Feb 2015 #28
Wow! That is so cool. cbayer Feb 2015 #30
Lots of trees here where I am and some light pollution Fumesucker Feb 2015 #31
Our view is completely unobstructed and we often have a complete cbayer Feb 2015 #34
And yet you just said AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #33
Simply not true. trotsky Feb 2015 #29
No we fucking don't. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #32
No we don't, that's a stupid assertion, what we don't understand now we call unknown. Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #39
Both series(both Carl Sagan's and Neil Degrasse Tyson's, and their hosts and producers... Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #20
Yes, but there are some here who are so gaga over NDT skepticscott Feb 2015 #40
The contrast between Dawkins and Tyson is this, their specialties... Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»~Neil DeGrasse Tyson Show...»Reply #0