Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is science a religion? [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)122. Poor GG really had to torture quotes to even pretend that they answered my questions
I mean seriously, claiming Carl Sagan saying The Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be. is equivalent to saying that any inquiry outside of science has "no value"?
Or claiming that E. O. Wilson saying All tangible phenomena, from the birth of the stars to the workings of social institutions, are based on material processes that are ultimately reducible, however long and torturous the sequences, to the laws of physics. is exactly the same as him saying that science is the "singular arbiter of value"?
And apparently he had to re-animate Bertrand Russell to get him to qualify as a "live person".
Not to mention providing his quotes without links or context. Very convenient.
Try again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Revising and improving interpretations of the stories, and writing new stories
Htom Sirveaux
Apr 2015
#7
I didn't say that the stories got revised, I said the interpretations did.
Htom Sirveaux
Apr 2015
#12
it is only a small cult here who do that as part of a team building exercise.
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2015
#17
I see no way in which science can be characterized as a religion, despite some similarities.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#18
I think that refers to stubborn insistence that one's position is the singular exclusive position...
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#25
I find it extremely aggravating to argue with the scientifically illiterate...
Humanist_Activist
Apr 2015
#20
I think some people believe in science in the same way others believe in God.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#34
I see no evidence that the act of belief in the human mind is different whether it be science or god.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#41
Give 'em a break, SS. They're basically homeless (their words) on that yacht in Mexico.
cleanhippie
Apr 2015
#93
"Religion gives an explanation based on reason, not cause and effect."
beam me up scottie
Apr 2015
#61
your use of the word reason was an example of an equivocation fallacy.
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2015
#66
Poor GG really had to torture quotes to even pretend that they answered my questions
skepticscott
Apr 2015
#122
I just pointed to a thread (and a post you didn't answer at the time) from three years ago
LTX
Apr 2015
#125
The truth. You haz it. Science and Religion are different iterations of the same human natures...
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#128
We can have both, we do and we must and we always will have both. And, both depend upon faith.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#86
Yes, viruses and religion have also been with humankind throughout history
skepticscott
Apr 2015
#91
Nope. Language, greed, and organization into communities are not exclusively human.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#101
no, science is not a relig.. BUT if it were it would be one worth dying for, nuts & bolts that's all
juxtaposed
Apr 2015
#110