Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

locks

(2,012 posts)
18. The more important question is
Fri Apr 24, 2015, 05:53 PM
Apr 2015

why does France (or the USA and 180 other states) have diplomatic relations and send ambassadors to Vatican City but not to Mecca, Jerusalem, or any other "religious" city?
From C.P.G.Grey Vatican City Explained: "The King of Vatican City (the Pope) has absolute unchecked power within the country's borders and his presence makes Vatican City one of only six remaining absolute monarchies in the world. The King's absolute power is one reason why Vatican City cannot join the European Union because only democracies are allowed." C.P.G. Grey, Vatican City Explained.
The Holy See was made a nonmember permanent observer of the United Nations in 1964 and given full rights of membership except voting in 2004. The only other "nonmember" is the State of Palestine. Israel is not considered "a Jewish state."

The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy: "..the status of the Holy See as a nonmember permanent observer to the UN is questionable. Moreover, there are doubts about whether in 1964 the UN is creating a precedent for similar claims by other religions. To ensure that the UN does not promote one particular religious view religious entities such as the Roman Catholic Church should not be permitted to participate in that body as nonmember states."

We can only hope France will tell the Vatican it is not interested in sending an ambassador and 180 other states will follow.

I'm sure his champions here will applaud this skepticscott Apr 2015 #1
How judgmental bvf Apr 2015 #3
Go get 'em, Frank! bvf Apr 2015 #2
Hey, give PopeAwesome some credit! Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #4
Baby steps, right? bvf Apr 2015 #5
Who knows, maybe it will happen in 3000. Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #6
France should now severe all relations with the Vatican Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #7
The Catholic Laity needs to sever relations. cleanhippie Apr 2015 #8
No, because people here and elsewhere skepticscott Apr 2015 #15
They ignored the nins at their own peril! cleanhippie Apr 2015 #19
that went well the last time they tried it, LOL.... mike_c Apr 2015 #9
Absolutely right. bvf Apr 2015 #13
Why have an ambassador to a small city-state TlalocW Apr 2015 #10
Because it's rich as all fucking get-out bvf Apr 2015 #11
Yay Wonderpope Frank! Who is he to judge, indeed! trotsky Apr 2015 #12
Here's the Reuters report, the source of the OP. rug Apr 2015 #14
The Holy See signed the Vienna Convention in April 1961 struggle4progress Apr 2015 #16
Pope Francis meets with gay French ambassador nominee struggle4progress Apr 2015 #17
The more important question is locks Apr 2015 #18
Never gonna happen. Too many defend and carry water for the RCC. Just look upthread. cleanhippie Apr 2015 #20
Replying to the usual broadbrushes posting the usual shit. rug Apr 2015 #22
Glad to see he's quit stalling and showed his true colours. beam me up scottie Apr 2015 #21
it's like clockwork. edhopper Apr 2015 #23
And the cut-and-paste excerpts allow them to hide behind other's bigotry. beam me up scottie Apr 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope ‘personally’ rejects...»Reply #18