Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Warning Over Religious Believers in Chinese Communist Party Ranks [View all]Jim__
(15,282 posts)7. Maybe from: Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 - Private Property and Communism
In essence would be an interpretation. Here's an excerpt from the essay:
This material, immediately perceptible private property is the material perceptible expression of estranged human life. Its movement production and consumption is the perceptible revelation of the movement of all production until now, i.e., the realisation or the reality of man. Religion, family, state, law, morality, science, art, etc., are only particular modes of production, and fall under its general law. The positive transcendence of private property as the appropriation of human life, is therefore the positive transcendence of all estrangement that is to say, the return of man from religion, family, state, etc., to his human, i.e., social, existence. Religious estrangement as such occurs only in the realm of consciousness, of mans inner life, but economic estrangement is that of real life; its transcendence therefore embraces both aspects. It is evident that the initial stage of the movement amongst the various peoples depends on whether the true recognised life of the people manifests itself more in consciousness or in the external world is more ideal or real. Communism begins from the outset (Owen) with atheism; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We'll just have to disagree the "opiate" is just as much or more so the substance as manner .
Leontius
May 2015
#11
Maybe from: Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 - Private Property and Communism
Jim__
May 2015
#7
1 I prefer not to root through your posts at the moment but it remains demonstrable.
rug
May 2015
#24
1 you say you can demonstrate it, but won't. Playing tennis without a net much?
Yorktown
May 2015
#33
And yet you wrote "I don't pray to them but yes (I believe in them) for the most part."
Yorktown
May 2015
#58
Idk about that. Some atheists are pretty fundamentally adhered to the claim that there is no God or afterlife.
PoliticalPothead
May 2015
#55