Religion
In reply to the discussion: Evolution-Accepting Christian Professor: Bible Doesn’t Have to Conflict with Scientific Realities [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)He remains a creationist.
"God created the world with the intention that we would be here and that we would one day be capable of interacting with him"
Note that is not just the universe was poofed up by this god thing, that it is that this tiny little planet we are on was created along with us stupid ass bald apes as the intentional act of a creator deity. He has to believe that idiocy 'cause his bible tells him so.
That nonsense is incompatible with science. It asserts that the ancient cosmology with the earth as the center of a creator god's attention remains valid. It is utter horseshit and specious nonsense.
Hardin tries to get out of his massive holy book problem with this mess:
Hardin recognizes, crucially, that when the two books dont seem to match, the error might be in his own understanding of the Bible. Rather than reject what science has discovered, he asks how Scripture can be understood better so that it fits the scientific evidence.
Note that apparently science, like the bible, is just "a book", but lets ignore the problem with that viewpoint.
So when clear idiocy is discovered in the holy book, rather than the obvious explanation: it is pathetic nonsense, Hardin goes into the standard dodge of inventing new gibberish to replace the existing gibberish and then claiming that the new sciency gibberish is the correct "understanding" of the obvious old gibberish in his ridiculous book of ancient nonsense.