Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: The Mistrust of Science [View all]

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
25. Most of that post is nonsense, and just an excuse to throw insults like 'imbecile' around
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

You don't know what 'a priori' means, so I suggest you find out before using it again.

"Quantum mechanics, upon which 70 % of modern industry is said to depend, would not even have been discovered, nor ever would be."

"Would not even have been discovered" ... if what? Einstein was instrumental in it, and it's well known he wasn't religious. Those who did formulate it did not do so because of religion. They did it because of the results of observations and experiments. Who is it you are damning as "hypocrites and parasites", then?

The Mistrust of Science [View all] rug Jun 2016 OP
Complete bullsh*t. It was Judaeo-Christians and deists who Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #1
First, Einstein was a pantheist, not a deist. longship Jun 2016 #2
Actually, qite a few scientists were theists before the founding of the USA. rug Jun 2016 #10
Now, you're starting with the Spinoza bullsh*t. Rather than the Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #13
No, one has to actually listen to Einstein to know what he means by Spinoza's god. longship Jun 2016 #18
The funny thing is.... AlbertCat Jun 2016 #28
Oh boy. DetlefK Jun 2016 #3
I presume you're not asserting that atheism is a prerequisite for science. rug Jun 2016 #4
No. DetlefK Jun 2016 #6
Atheists don't claim absolute knowledge. Are you 'agnostic' about Leprechauns? immoderate Jun 2016 #31
Two massive fails there, so truly, your psot cannot be Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #14
Oh, come on. One could as well make an argument that "white people" invented science. DetlefK Jun 2016 #21
"Oh, all the big thinkers were religious! It must have been their religion!" So Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #24
Confirmation bias. immoderate Jun 2016 #32
You seem to have read a different article muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #5
Did you miss this? rug Jun 2016 #8
'divinity and experience and common sense'. It's not attacking experience or common sense, either muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #11
I tend to scan posts too quickly. There is a Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #15
"True atheist scientists are parasites". You get that from a speech about science and vaccines muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #17
No. I was simply 'getting on my high horse' about this business. What Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #19
No. I did not get that from matey's speech about science and vaccines. Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #23
Most of that post is nonsense, and just an excuse to throw insults like 'imbecile' around muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #25
'The great physicist Edwin Hubble, speaking at Caltech’s commencement in 1938, Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #20
It was called The Enlightenment edhopper Jun 2016 #7
Tell that to muriel. He's under the impression this has nothing to do with religion. rug Jun 2016 #9
Many did. Igel Jun 2016 #12
And what an epic misnomer it was. With the daily exposure Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #22
"so-called Evolution" edhopper Jun 2016 #26
My pleasure. Very civiliised of you. And practical. I don't usually argue. Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #29
You don't have to be a 'new earth' scientist to entertain reasonable Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #16
Page 6 of this linked article is particularly interesting : Joe Chi Minh Jun 2016 #27
Kick! HuckleB Jun 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Mistrust of Science»Reply #25