Religion

muriel_volestrangler

(101,258 posts)

32. Hey, guy, trotsky replied with a post about cardinal sins

Fri Oct 14, 2016, 12:30 PM

Oct 2016

(the topic of the OP, especially since this is the Religion forum, so it's the religious part of what Biden said we should concentrate on). stone space then responded with a off-topic quote of himself from another thread. trotsky pointed out his posts had been a waste of everyone's time in that thread, and then came stone space's "in a way that you might understand" remark, which was mildly rude.

trotsky did not call out anyone. stone space did not call out anyone, though he was a little bit rude.

On edit: ah, I'd forgotten that stone space later called trotsky 'nasty', and trotsky termed that "calling out". While I might quibble whether that fits the exact definition of "calling out", it's certainly insulting, wouldn't you agree?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

VP Joe Biden Calls Trump's Alleged Behavior a 'Cardinal Sin' [View all] stone space Oct 2016 OP

I agree with you, Joe. WheelWalker Oct 2016 #1

Me too...I stand with Biden on damn near everything. Moostache Oct 2016 #2

And millions of other Catholics, including the entire church leadership... trotsky Oct 2016 #3

I think that those on the religious right have to honestly ask themselves a simple question. stone space Oct 2016 #4

You should go find out what their answer is, since you're so curious about it. trotsky Oct 2016 #5

Let me see if I can put this in a way that you might understand. stone space Oct 2016 #6

Nope, because I can't answer that question, as I explained to you. trotsky Oct 2016 #7

Why are you so nasty? stone space Oct 2016 #8

Could you explain what exactly you found "nasty" about my response? trotsky Oct 2016 #9

You don't have to answer. It's no big deal. stone space Oct 2016 #10

Really? It was a big enough deal for you to call me out on it. trotsky Oct 2016 #11

Not worth my time. I was just curious, that's all. No big deal. stone space Oct 2016 #12

Not worth your time to apologize for implying I'm dim? trotsky Oct 2016 #13

Oh, good Lord! stone space Oct 2016 #14

What's the matter? trotsky Oct 2016 #15

calm down, trotsky...no need to go on and on stone space Oct 2016 #16

Why not? trotsky Oct 2016 #17

you seem obsessed stone space Oct 2016 #18

Naw, I've drawn this out long enough to show exactly what I wanted to. trotsky Oct 2016 #19

Here it is in a way you can understand Lordquinton Oct 2016 #20

Here's an idea: since you have a userid on Discussionist, and it's not currently suspended, muriel_volestrangler Oct 2016 #21

Damn! I need to get my star back. I'm seeing ads for other websites, here. stone space Oct 2016 #22

Replies like that are why no one takes you seriously. muriel_volestrangler Oct 2016 #23

Do you have anything besides personal insults and commercial spam for other websites? stone space Oct 2016 #24

It's criticism, not insults. And you know very well Discussionist is run by the DU admins muriel_volestrangler Oct 2016 #25

Why are you here if you believe that personal insults are the only things worth posting? stone space Oct 2016 #26

It's criticism, not insults. muriel_volestrangler Oct 2016 #27

LOL! stone space Oct 2016 #28

Hey, guys! Stone Space did not call out Trotsky. raging moderate Oct 2016 #29

Hi there, raging moderate. trotsky Oct 2016 #30

He doesn't have to. He 's already made an astute observation. rug Oct 2016 #31

Sometimes, a simple favor can result in a very, very long thread. stone space Oct 2016 #33

My post could easily be answered in a single reply. trotsky Oct 2016 #34

OK. Have a nice day! stone space Oct 2016 #35

Hey, guy, trotsky replied with a post about cardinal sins muriel_volestrangler Oct 2016 #32