Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie

(9,255 posts)
28. If "pro-life" means "legal protection of the unborn"
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 03:25 PM
Apr 2017

- imposing your view on others by force of law - that is NOT progressive.
If abortion is an unthinkable choice FOR YOU, feel free to do everything you can to prevent abortion, even discourage it - but the minute you try to impose your choice on others, you can no longer call yourself progressive or a feminist.

They can be as anti-choice for themselves as they want. But if they are anti-choice for other women, 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2017 #1
An excellent response. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #3
Thank you. 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2017 #5
John Kerry and Joe Biden are prefect examples of people who oppose abortion... nycbos Apr 2017 #7
And I, as pro-choice as it gets, voted for both of them. 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2017 #8
No doubt. nycbos Apr 2017 #9
The vast majority of progressive Democrats are religious. Lordquinton Apr 2017 #2
I would self-delete, but that would start another thread. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #4
So what's your point? Lordquinton Apr 2017 #6
Simply asking a question. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #11
A leading question that you know the answer to Lordquinton Apr 2017 #18
There are religious people that are pro choice Buzz cook Apr 2017 #10
Not if they oppose abortion and want to restrict my rights. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #12
It all depends on who is defining progressive. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #13
Well then why don't you define it for everyone. trotsky Apr 2017 #14
I have never defined what an atheist must believe. That is for atheists. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #16
Defend your posts. trotsky Apr 2017 #19
Good of you to define the terms and decide the outcome in advance, guillaumeb Apr 2017 #20
So be it. trotsky Apr 2017 #21
Opposing reproductive rights is regressive, it is a conservative position. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #15
My point is that positions vary, even in the Democratic Party. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #17
It is not progressive to oppose women's rights. Period. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #22
I am personally pro-choice. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #23
So you agree it's not progressive to oppose women's reproductive rights. beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #24
I am raising a question. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #25
I'm addressing the op: beam me up scottie Apr 2017 #26
They can be Dems (big tent party), but not progressives. ExciteBike66 Apr 2017 #27
If "pro-life" means "legal protection of the unborn" Freddie Apr 2017 #28
I am a male. Abortion would never be a choice for me. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #30
While there are truly progressive WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #29
My view is if you are voting to or supporting people who are trying to end or limit reproductive... hrmjustin Apr 2017 #31
I also support them. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #32
Personally I identify as a liberal Democrat. hrmjustin Apr 2017 #33
My Representative is a member of this group. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #36
Of course they can. Who thinks all religious people are pro-life? LAS14 Apr 2017 #34
This guy: Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #35
And if the threads are checked, one might notice the considerable number guillaumeb Apr 2017 #37
One might notice that. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Can religious Democrats b...»Reply #28