Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

silverweb

(16,412 posts)

1. Maybe, maybe not.

Reply to cbayer (Original post)

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:24 PM

Jan 2013

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The study method states, "We analysed data collected from interviews with 7403 people who participated in the third National Psychiatric Morbidity Study in England."

Data from people who had already participated in a "psychiatric morbidity" study? Wouldn't that seem a bit slanted to begin with?

I think I might have a bit more confidence in results drawn from a study of the general population.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The spiritual but not religious likely to face mental health issues, drug use, study says [View all] cbayer Jan 2013 OP

Maybe, maybe not. silverweb Jan 2013 #1

I am pretty sure that this was a study of the general population that was intended to cbayer Jan 2013 #3

Could be. silverweb Jan 2013 #7

I totally agree with you. One of the weaknesses of our educational cbayer Jan 2013 #8

Exactly. silverweb Jan 2013 #9

Easy to figure that one out get the red out Jan 2013 #2

This study looks well done and was published in Britian's top peer-reviewed psych journal. cbayer Jan 2013 #4

That would mean they have guts get the red out Jan 2013 #12

It could, but it could also mean that they may be rejecting more cbayer Jan 2013 #13

So was Wakefield's "study" on vaccines. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #16

As usual, they get it backwards NJCher Jan 2013 #5

Agree with you about the picture. It's intentionally inflammatory, imo. cbayer Jan 2013 #6

I know several nones okasha Jan 2013 #11

I think I know a lot more nones than I know active church goers. cbayer Jan 2013 #14

I must be missing somerhing. okasha Jan 2013 #15

I'm an agnostic, but even I find this offensive. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #10