Religion
In reply to the discussion: "Atheism: A personal relationship with reality." [View all]gcomeau
(5,764 posts)I asked you to explain how you evaluate ANY evidence given the inclusion of the supernatural in the set of allowable explanations for a given event/observation. You did not. Would you care to do so now?
Otherwise the claim that there is "plenty of subjective evidence" is meaningless twaddle.
For example: I have just observed a large rock roll past me down a hill.
Do explain to me how I might go about evaluating whether this is more likely to be evidence that:
A: Someone further up the hill may have pushed it.
B: Some random tremor or something else along those lines caused it to dislodge and roll down on its own.
C: God pushed it.
D: A witch sent it down the hill with a spell.
E... F... G......... ZZZZZZZZZZ : An endless number of other supernatural causes you could dream up.
I'm all ears.