Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
35. I'd rather pay my taxes for good health-care for the poorest of the poor as well as everyone else I
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

know. If the poor are healthy, there's a far greater chance those around them will be also. Our system allows those people to make the trips to see a doctor to remain healthy and treat illness and disease / injury early.

Just a note though on our taxes .... we also get back part of our travel, parking and hotel expenses for medical diagnostic and treatment if we have to go long distances for it, as well as:

The expenses covered for partial re-imbursement:

Payments to medical practitioners, dentists or nurses, or to public or licensed private hospitals in respect of medical or dental services;

Additional costs related to the purchase of non-gluten food products;

Expenses paid for training courses for a tax payer or a related person in respect of the care of a person with a mental or physical impairment, who lives with or is a dependant of the taxpayer;

Cost of purchased or leased products, equipment or devices that provide relief, assistance or treatment for any illness;

Cost of blood coagulation monitors for use by individuals who require anti-coagulation therapy, including pricking devices, lancets and test strips20;

Premiums paid to private health insurance plans;

Expenses incurred after 2013 for specially trained service animals that assist individuals with severe diabetes;

Remuneration for tutoring persons with learning disabilities, or other mental impairments, if the need for
such services is certified by a medical practitioner; and

Reasonable supplemental expenses for the construction or renovation of a residence to enable a person with a serious, prolonged handicap to have access to this residence, to move about therein and to carry out activities of daily living.

For 2014 and later years, the list of eligible medical expenses was expanded to include amounts paid for the design of an individualized therapy plan, where the cost of the therapy itself would be eligible for the credit and certain other conditions are met. In particular, the plan must be designed for an individual who qualifies for the disability tax credit

http://www.taxplanningguide.ca/tax-planning-guide/section-2-individuals/medical-expenses/


Think Canadians pay some of highest income taxes in the world? Think again


The OECD, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, reports in its annual Taxing Wages report that Belgium workers had the highest tax burden -- the so-called "tax wedge" -- last year. Their rate stood at 55.8 per cent.

The tax wedge is the difference between what businesses pay to employ a worker, and the net take-home pay of the employee’s after income taxes, employee-plus-employer social security contributions, and minus benefits.

Germany came in second, with a tax burden at 49.3 per cent.

Canada, meanwhile, is ranked 26th among the 31 OECD nations, with a 31.1 per cent tax wedge. The U.S. ranked 25th, with a slightly higher tax wedge of 31.3 per cent.

Across all the OECD nations, the average tax burden on income was 35.9 per cent last year. That’s up from 35.7 per cent in 2012. The report found the tax wedge rose in 21 out of 34 countries, fell in 12, and remained unchanged in one.

In most countries, the increase in the tax wedge was almost entirely due to higher income taxes. But in Canada, higher employee and employer social security contributions (such as to CPP) accounted for virtually all of the increased tax wedge.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/think-canadians-pay-some-of-highest-income-taxes-in-the-world-think-again-1.1771575

https://slumbuddy.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/comparison-of-canadian-and-us-federal-tax-rates-for-2011/

Comparison of Canadian and US federal tax rates for 2011

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/2000002/5071-eng.pdf Taxes in Canada and the U.S.:

How much does each spend per person? whatthehey Jan 2016 #1
Quite important; I have that too Recursion Jan 2016 #3
So...significantly less than the US then? whatthehey Jan 2016 #6
Agreed! kenfrequed Jan 2016 #46
Never mind Canada's health care cost are much lessr than ours. -none Jan 2016 #2
Those numbers are freely available at both countries' CMS Recursion Jan 2016 #4
Out of pocket smacks of insurance. -none Jan 2016 #5
And yet... Canada pays a greater portion of its healthcare out of pocket than the US does (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #9
Totally untrue. -none Jan 2016 #24
No, you're just completely wrong there Recursion Jan 2016 #26
Private insurance in Canada is supplementary or extended insurance... SidDithers Jan 2016 #40
How Canadian Health-Care does not suck. polly7 Jan 2016 #7
Yup, that first one was my data source (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #12
A slightly larger amount of a much lower number Schema Thing Jan 2016 #8
Yup Recursion Jan 2016 #10
Is their some contingent claiming that 'single-payer' must have no Schema Thing Jan 2016 #14
Is there? I have no idea. Recursion Jan 2016 #15
the word single payer does mean that dsc Jan 2016 #44
Somehow it doesn't mean that in Canada- the most well known example... Schema Thing Jan 2016 #45
single payer means one payer dsc Jan 2016 #47
Dig in as your argument gets thoroughly discected. artislife Jan 2016 #28
Yep. not sure why you think I disagree with that. Recursion Jan 2016 #32
Disingenuous OP title. HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #11
Not remotely, unless somebody doesn't know what "percent" means (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #13
Sure, but the title implies that somehow... HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #18
No, it's pretty clearly just a statement that a larger % of Canadian health care spending Recursion Jan 2016 #19
Then why bother posting it? HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #20
Why respond? Recursion Jan 2016 #21
Because... HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #22
Except people don't spend percents. They spend dollars whatthehey Jan 2016 #29
And how many Canadians are not covered at all? marmar Jan 2016 #16
Yup. That's another great point Recursion Jan 2016 #17
private insurance enid602 Jan 2016 #23
That is totally not true. -none Jan 2016 #30
insurance enid602 Jan 2016 #38
Sure, but what is the insurance for? Face lifts and tummy tucks? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2016 #41
Sounding like a broken record Jarqui Jan 2016 #25
Funny how no one in Canada would trade for our wonderful system. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #27
Very true. -none Jan 2016 #34
I think the point that you miss... JayhawkSD Jan 2016 #31
Are taxes "out of pocket" too? Recursion Jan 2016 #33
I'd rather pay my taxes for good health-care for the poorest of the poor as well as everyone else I polly7 Jan 2016 #35
Btw .... what do your taxes go towards? Helping anyone else? nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #37
Greater percent, but smaller amount of money - look at the second to last chart karynnj Jan 2016 #36
More manipulative bullshit from the Hillarian Lie Factory. 99Forever Jan 2016 #39
Don't blame Hillary for this one. This bull shit comes from further down the tracks. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2016 #42
Birds of a feather.... 99Forever Jan 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Canada finances a greater...»Reply #35