Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Seeks NEO-CON Shelter (against the Sanders storm) [View all]
Comment: Having lived through eight years of a Neocon president in the White House, and eight years of Neocon "aftertaste" within the Obama administration, has been more than enough Neocon to last me for the rest of my life. I CERTAINLY don't wish to see a new fully Neocon administration led by a professed Democrat.If anybody really wanted another Neocon President, "Jeb!" would be in the lead for the GOP nomination. Seems that even Republicans don't want a Neocon encore.
This article describes a lot of Hillary's behind-the-scenes neocon-maneuverings within the Obama administration, of which many are probably not aware. I strongly suggest reading the whole article. ~ John Poet
Stunned by falling poll numbers, Hillary Clinton is hoping that Democrats will rally to her neocon-oriented foreign policy and break with Bernie Sanders as insufficiently devoted to Israel. But will that hawkish strategy work this time?
by Robert Parry
In seeking to put Sen. Bernie Sanders on the defensive over his foreign policy positions, ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is embracing a neoconservative stance on the Middle East and gambling that her more hawkish approach will win over Democratic voters.
Losing ground in Iowa and New Hampshire in recent polls, the Clinton campaign has counterattacked against Sanders, targeting his sometimes muddled comments on the Mideast crisis, but Clintons attack line suggests that Sanders isnt adequately committed to the positions of Israels right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his American neocon acolytes.
Clintons strategy is to hit Sanders for seeking a gradual normalization of relations with Iran, while Clinton has opted for the neocon position of demonizing Iran and siding with Israel and its quiet alliance with Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states that share Israels animosity toward Shiite-ruled Iran.
By attaching herself to this neocon approach of hyping every conceivable offense by Iran while largely excusing the human rights crimes of Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Sunni-run states, Clinton is betting that most Democratic voters share the neocon-dominated group think of Official Washington: Iran-our-enemy, Israel/Saudi Arabia-our-friends.
She made similar calculations when she voted for and supported President George W. Bushs invasion and occupation of Iraq; when she sided with the neocons in pushing President Barack Obama to escalate the war in Afghanistan; and when she instigated regime change in Libya all policies that had dubious and dangerous outcomes. But she seems to still believe that she will benefit politically if she continues siding with the neocons and their liberal interventionist side-kicks.
:::snip:::
Arguably, Obamas most fateful decision of his presidency occurred shortly after the 2008 election when he opted for the trendy idea of a team of rivals to run his foreign policy. He left Bush family loyalist Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense, retained a neocon-dominated senior officer corps led by the likes of Gen. David Petraeus, and picked hawkish Sen. Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State. Thus, Obama never took control of his own foreign policy.
The troika of Clinton-Gates-Petraeus challenged Obama over his desire to wind down the Afghan War, bureaucratically mouse-trapping him into an ill-advised surge that accomplished little other than getting another 1,750 U.S. soldiers killed along with many more Afghans. Nearly three-quarters of the 2,380 U.S. soldiers who died in Afghanistan were killed on Obamas watch.
:::snip::::
Gates also reported on what he regarded as a stunning admission by Clinton, writing: The exchange that followed was remarkable. In strongly supporting the surge in Afghanistan, Hillary told the president that her opposition to the surge in Iraq had been political because she was facing him in the Iowa primary [in 2008]. She went on to say, The Iraq surge worked.
:::snip:::
Read more:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/01/24/hillary-clinton-seeks-neocon-shelter
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
68 replies, 9759 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (84)
ReplyReply to this post
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It was an excellent and most enlightening read on what was happening behind the doors.
Uncle Joe
Jan 2016
#4
Yes... how anyone can vote for Hillary based on what we now know about her Neocon ways is beyond me!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2016
#26
Well said... which is precisely why we need a REAL progressive as our candidate...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2016
#27
Hillary voters are wedded to her for reasons I cannot even begin to understand... good luck changin their minds.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2016
#29
The worst thing Bush did was invade Iraq, something for which Hillary advocated. Democrats condemned
merrily
Jan 2016
#7
Not news to me... suspected all along. Hillary is dangerous and must be defeated.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2016
#32
Whenever Hillary speaks about the Middle East, she sounds just like any neocon Repug.
reformist2
Jan 2016
#10
The death and destruction we brought to Iraq being referred to as a "gift"?
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#53
So, I took another look...and stand by my post. Sorry you find it authoritarian.
libdem4life
Jan 2016
#66
Her differing viewpoints are confusing. Here's a time line to help sort it out~
RiverLover
Jan 2016
#18
It makes me a bit nauseous thinking of all the people who do trust her. Who only look at how
RiverLover
Jan 2016
#50
I liked it when Bernie Sanders said in the last debate that he wants normalization
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#25
He wants to 'move as aggressively as we can to normalize relations with Iran'
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#38
I approached the 2008 election fully prepared to vote for Hillary Clinton.
summerschild
Jan 2016
#41