2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why did Mrs. Greenspan Automatically Think of Hillary When She Saw This Ad? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)trying to PROTECT these extremely privileged people is as revealing as many of the other odd things we've witnessed on this Dem site. I love it when rocks are turned over and you get to see what is underneath.
I'm curious that way! It's just highly amusing to me to see this privileged wealthy woman being PROTECTED here.
It's 'sexist' lol, to call her by her married name, is it? Well, the RICH do experience privileges the poor do not.
Poor women eg, generally do go by their married names. I never felt they were 'demeaning' themselves by doing so.
Many are proud of their husbands. See that's the thing, it was SUPPOSED to be 'all about choice'.
Which is fine, if you are NOT a public figure. Once you begin to enjoy all the privileges Mrs Greenspan enjoys, then you take a job that involves the public trust, full disclosure as to who you really are, what biases you may have due to personal connections, is required.
It's really very simple.
And as saw in the interview, her own biases were revealed when she asked Sanders that question. Why would she assume that referring to Wall St Corruption and control over our Politicians, was NEGATIVE?
I think it's fantastically positive that we are finally addressing this huge problem in this country.
But then I'm not married to Mr Greenspan! Lol!