2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sadly, over the Hill [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... is from your OP entitled: "'I won't vote for Hillary' is the canary in the coal mine"
There was NOTHING in our exchange about healthcare, or having lost someone - not a single word.
My response was: "I feel your pain. Clearly HRC's front-runner status and her ever-rising poll numbers are reflective of a complete lack of enthusiasm for her candidacy, and demonstrative of a feeling of apathy among Democrats," etc.
Obviously, "I feel your pain" was a sarcastic response to your OP: "You can harangue DU until your keyboard is reduced to smoking ruin, that might get a few dozen or a few hundred DUers to vote for Hillary but it's not going to change the minds of the millions of others who would normally vote for a Democrat but will most likely just stay home if Hillary is the nominee."
Trying to insinuate that my response had anything to do with "your pain" at having lost a child (which I didn't even know about) in a discussion about HRC's electability is truly beneath contempt.
What happened here is obvious. You accused me of making statements I never made - and when challenged to provide a link to any such statements, you simply took a comment of mine on a completely unrelated topic and attempted to mislead people into thinking our exchange was about single payer healthcare, or your loss of a child.
Well, you provided the link - which means that anyone who bothers to follow it can see what the exchange was actually about, and can see that you lied about its subject matter and content.
You really should be ashamed.