Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Red Oak

(697 posts)
12. She'll get it right next time! Promise!
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
Feb 2016

Well, it may depend on who has given her the most money lately...but, whatever.

"Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clinton’s State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release."

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

So if the Wardogs whip up the people again with fake information, She will be for the next war too. virtualobserver Feb 2016 #1
and it's the fallout from the Iraq war Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #39
Has she ever met a war.... daleanime Feb 2016 #2
The war on wall street? Paulie Feb 2016 #10
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #13
Boom! daleanime Feb 2016 #25
+1. n/t bvf Feb 2016 #28
Yes! Joe Nation Feb 2016 #23
"we should be making this decision based on the next war" - I think it a million times djean111 Feb 2016 #3
Cool story. frylock Feb 2016 #4
No sale Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #5
So what about good judgement do you not understand? Avalux Feb 2016 #6
Henry Kissinger. Darth Cheney's Sith Master eom mikehiggins Feb 2016 #9
I don't agree...I knew there was no real reason to invade Iraq. Why didn't she? Punkingal Feb 2016 #7
500,000 dead ? this doesn't matter to you???WOW bowens43 Feb 2016 #8
Wasn't an issue in the past was it? pinebox Feb 2016 #11
She'll get it right next time! Promise! Red Oak Feb 2016 #12
If you want a Neocon that sounds EXACTLY like Bush and Cheney MauriceLawrence96 Feb 2016 #14
Not sure... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #15
Also the 19 minute speech she made imploring others to vote with her Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #16
She has a long way to go to match Kissingers death total. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #17
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Feb 2016 #18
It's far from ridiculous casperthegm Feb 2016 #19
Oh, you were serious. SamKnause Feb 2016 #20
What's ridiculous is asserting that Iraq is some musty, irrelevant issue cali Feb 2016 #21
Yeah, but who got it right last time Broward Feb 2016 #22
The Wicked War on Syria polly7 Feb 2016 #24
Ridiuclous? Wow...yes...concern over the war and it breaking the country and all we stand for ViseGrip Feb 2016 #26
Pardon me, but your expectation is showing. bvf Feb 2016 #27
You are hiding a small lie inside a bigger lie, to wit, that "72% of KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #29
I am thinking about the future wars My Good Babushka Feb 2016 #30
Yes, when considering who will make the right decision going forward LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #31
The Best Way to Predict SDJay Feb 2016 #32
. Wilms Feb 2016 #33
The "last war" isn`t over, Joe Nation. democrank Feb 2016 #34
Yes, war has consequences Joe Nation Feb 2016 #35
I can and do blame Clinton. Maedhros Feb 2016 #40
A leader doesn't accommodate the lowest common denominator farleftlib Feb 2016 #41
Hillary had NO EXCUSE for being duped by George Bush Dems to Win Feb 2016 #36
All you should really think about is who represented you! highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #37
We are living in the aftermath of that vote!! The entire region was destabilized because of that. jillan Feb 2016 #38
Some seem to forget this fact. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #43
This is satire, right? Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #42
Do I hear a "completely agree"? Joe Nation Feb 2016 #44
the IWR wouldn't have passed without the Dems, and she led the Dem hawk charge in '02 MisterP Feb 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Sanders Campaign Crit...»Reply #12