Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I bet this won't show up in the MSM. And I bet Maddow will not touch it either. yourout Feb 2016 #1
Rachel has been to Flint and has carried water. leftofcool Feb 2016 #7
That is great, but SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #27
How? No fish can survive in Flint River. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #49
Rachel has had a certain an obvious change of some kind. Separate and apart from silvershadow Feb 2016 #57
keep in mind Rachel works for MSNBC tiredtoo Feb 2016 #61
Exactly.. The reason Cenk chose to leave is he wouldn't play along with the establishment Dems...... raindaddy Feb 2016 #98
Yeah, well, principles don't pay the bills, do they? frylock Feb 2016 #130
Actually in Cenk's case they do..... raindaddy Feb 2016 #140
And Big Ed is over at RT now. Shout out for Cenk and Anna !!! libdem4life Feb 2016 #147
Big Ed and TYT !!! raindaddy Feb 2016 #148
I'd be willing to be Cenk isn't behind Plucketeer Feb 2016 #162
Are you insinuating that he should have sold his integrity Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #170
I was being facetious. frylock Feb 2016 #175
In that case, my bad. Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #177
Nah, I shoulda left a sarcasm tag. frylock Feb 2016 #178
I finally just transferred my allegiance to Rachel over to Abby Martin, of truedelphi Feb 2016 #172
Thanks for the tip - I'll check it out. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #179
MSNBC won't let her touch it. Guarantee you or she'll get the ax like Ed Shultz. YOHABLO Feb 2016 #180
Yuck boomer55 Feb 2016 #2
Team Weathervane SHRED Feb 2016 #3
The "I'll say anything to get elected" candidate FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #11
Yes, but at least Hillary is TRYING to tell the truth! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #117
Search youtube for videos of merrily Feb 2016 #119
+420 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #132
the wack-a-mole platform tk2kewl Feb 2016 #15
And this why they absolutely WILL NOT tell us just why they support her Lorien Feb 2016 #85
a core vision we understand. Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #163
How can her fans defend this??? Lorien Feb 2016 #4
they "ask" why lefties believe that free trade agrements cost jobs, because it brings in MisterP Feb 2016 #5
The jobs go with or without free trade agreements Recursion Feb 2016 #58
You have to be kidding Lorien Feb 2016 #74
I'm 40, and I remember the late 90s being much better than the 80s and early 90s Recursion Feb 2016 #83
I'm a hell of a lot older than you, and we lost a shit ton of jobs thanks to NAFTA Lorien Feb 2016 #88
And so is Houston, which is doing pretty well. Recursion Feb 2016 #99
The facts as of November 2003 JDPriestly Feb 2016 #115
And if manufacturing were the only sector of the economy, the late 90s would have been awful Recursion Feb 2016 #116
Read the article. It caused a loss in jobs, especially in jobs that require no college degree. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #125
I strongly object to the trade courts, the arbitration courts, otherwise known as the kangaroo JDPriestly Feb 2016 #111
Fair enough, and I'm glad you at least recognize they long predate the TPP Recursion Feb 2016 #112
And what is your experience with the trade courts? JDPriestly Feb 2016 #126
Peripherally; I worked for a fisheries lobby during that damned catfish case with Vietnam Recursion Feb 2016 #131
Isn't that Canadian energy company suing Ilsa Feb 2016 #174
I'm not sure, but that is my understanding. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #183
Who would have thunk it at the time greiner3 Feb 2016 #166
And he was obviously wrong: 23 million net jobs were created after NAFTA (nt) Recursion Feb 2016 #182
No FTA with China, but there is this... thesquanderer Feb 2016 #97
Which is precisely *normal* trade relations; they aren't specifically sanctioned Recursion Feb 2016 #101
No but bill clinton negotiated the u.s china trade agreement berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #133
NAFTA cost 1 million American jobs, sulphurdunn Feb 2016 #165
Cheap stuff is all you can afford after you've lost your job.. whathehell Feb 2016 #144
As unpleasant as it is to us, I think they are. Avalux Feb 2016 #6
So it's just about "winning"? Consequences be damned? Lorien Feb 2016 #71
Hillary's hardcore supporters were pro TPP until she pretended to be against it jfern Feb 2016 #8
She could co-host a kitten barbecue hifiguy Feb 2016 #20
I agree. SamKnause Feb 2016 #60
No different than Dubya's followers Lorien Feb 2016 #76
I agree. SamKnause Feb 2016 #79
It's like... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #96
Disciples - operating on faith rather than fact. n/t ebayfool Feb 2016 #86
"There is nothing so frightful hifiguy Feb 2016 #94
More mental gymnastics than evangelical talibangelists some days. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #77
Some are corporatists, and there are some very strident ones here Populist_Prole Feb 2016 #89
+ 1000 Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #105
Also massive in-sourcing through expanding H1B Programs. bvar22 Feb 2016 #136
SO...she DOES lie. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #9
Like a Turkish rug. bt hifiguy Feb 2016 #21
LOL! in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #26
When it gets to this stage there's a hifiguy Feb 2016 #39
She does have Nixonitis! Her Goldman Sachs speeches = 18 minutes of missing tape recording! in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #51
Oh be fair, Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #64
Okay in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #66
I meant be fair to Nixon Kelvin Mace Feb 2016 #67
Yes he did. He also gave us HMOs and was a Crook. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #73
I say old bean, well played! hifiguy Feb 2016 #87
Like I've said, if she told me the sky were blue VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #43
Yep. If she ever shook my hand hifiguy Feb 2016 #45
You'd count your fingers? I'd need hand sanitizer for whatever stumps are left. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #48
Every time I see Bill pointing his long, skinny index finger . . . . Divernan Feb 2016 #63
Years ago, I did. I had to beg her to return it. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #52
Did she tell you to cut it out and quit expecting handouts? VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #78
Like a sleeping dog. nt cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #72
I think ever her devout followers Kall Feb 2016 #68
. merrily Feb 2016 #128
Pants on fire stuff! ebayfool Feb 2016 #10
Puts money in back pocket, and lies spew out of mouth Kittycat Feb 2016 #25
Very nice ain't it? She gets obscenely rich farleftlib Feb 2016 #31
+1 Kittycat Feb 2016 #44
True. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #82
Searching for the most appropriate adjective to describe 2banon Feb 2016 #12
TY TubbersUK - rec'd and bookmarked! n/t ebayfool Feb 2016 #13
Thanks for posting this and letting us see what's really going on jillan Feb 2016 #14
I second that! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #118
Now you see how stupid it was to have her own server. All her secrets are getting exposed. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #16
Maybe, but now you see why she wanted her own server in the first place. merrily Feb 2016 #123
Replied to wrong post farleftlib Feb 2016 #145
Anybody here think she actually is against the TPP? n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #17
No. nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #29
No. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #84
Not me. reformist2 Feb 2016 #137
this is so bad.... this back dealing... when is it going to stop? kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #18
As soon as she's in the Oval Office, of course. merrily Feb 2016 #127
Well, well isn't this something? farleftlib Feb 2016 #19
Sigh....Business as usual -- unfortunately Armstead Feb 2016 #22
What else are we going to find out? And why is the DNC so strongly supporting her? Duval Feb 2016 #23
I think they're afraid of both candidates in different ways Fumesucker Feb 2016 #46
Every Union member Kittycat Feb 2016 #24
^^^^^That! Right there!^^^^^ n/t ebayfool Feb 2016 #36
All it would take is one large Union endorsement to be retracted salib Feb 2016 #142
Um, Bernie Supporter Here BUT...if her BOSS (President Obama) supported IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #28
If a person opposes something like the TPP, strongly, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #32
Or shut up and do your job because the other guy won. nt IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #37
oh, yes, she needed a job because they were "dead broke". Oh, PLEASE! nt antigop Feb 2016 #42
Secretary of State is a job that isn't supposed to be just money - IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #122
"just following orders" is NOT an excuse. nt antigop Feb 2016 #124
No, it is A JOB and people unwillingness to do their job quit. IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #151
and she didn't quit. That says it all. "Just following orders" is NOT an excuse. nt antigop Feb 2016 #156
Depends on how strongly she opposed the TPP. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #50
The guy who supported it won the election. She worked for him. IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #153
Umm - she bucked the other guy when it suited her "stature & long-term impact" (ie running again). ebayfool Feb 2016 #95
Sometimes you can convince your boss to see it your way. IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #154
ah, yes, someone who is friends with Kissinger. Good lord. nt antigop Feb 2016 #158
Fair point... Glamrock Feb 2016 #34
imo it would be a fair point only if she put up a real fight with Obama. If however she snagglepuss Feb 2016 #59
Agreed, as per the same batch of e-mails she pushed back hard & successfully on Foreign Policy TubbersUK Feb 2016 #80
Yup. "Celebrating Clinton "turning [Obama] around," apparently on Libya" ebayfool Feb 2016 #91
Well there you go, very persuasive when she cares to be. Should we hold our breath snagglepuss Feb 2016 #134
and this is why she is not considered to be trustworthy. nt antigop Feb 2016 #30
I was just reading that article nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #33
Let us bark Oilwellian Feb 2016 #35
Oh snap farleftlib Feb 2016 #38
OMFG... I'm beginning to believe she IS a compulsive liar. She's so SLIMY. Wow! AzDar Feb 2016 #40
Wish these had come out sooner, but, better now then never. FailureToCommunicate Feb 2016 #41
But she can't remember ever lying. iemitsu Feb 2016 #47
This video says it all! markpkessinger Feb 2016 #53
Yep Lorien Feb 2016 #81
The Video is a Must Watch! Having all the "Flip Flops" Documented KoKo Feb 2016 #143
BAU Old Codger Feb 2016 #54
why don't we send this article to Scott Pelley, to whom she lied yesterday. nt grasswire Feb 2016 #55
+10000000 nashville_brook Feb 2016 #62
Oh Snap! There she goes again! Ford_Prefect Feb 2016 #56
Say one thing to insiders and another thing to the public. pa28 Feb 2016 #65
Yup! They've been dealing with her long enough to know she's lying during those speeches. ebayfool Feb 2016 #70
I'm pretty sure that was her job description at that point in time? Recursion Feb 2016 #69
You really are grasping to justify this nastiness Lorien Feb 2016 #92
It's the duplicity. Saying one thing to one crowd, but having a different face as a politician Armstead Feb 2016 #93
They show her setting herself up as setting policy - not Obama. ebayfool Feb 2016 #100
I would add, "breaking: Clinton overstates own role in policy decisionmaking" (nt) Recursion Feb 2016 #102
A position that she did not have to accept if the position went against her core principles... xocet Feb 2016 #106
IDK. TPP strikes me as marginally better than our current bilateral agreements Recursion Feb 2016 #109
OMG what. I sometimes forget this is not just politics, the opponent here is Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #75
What can you say............................. turbinetree Feb 2016 #90
Clinton! She's for herself and she wants us to be for her too! #Imwithher PoliticalMalcontent Feb 2016 #103
But considering it is her time... scscholar Feb 2016 #171
And yet she does not believe she has ever lied. PatrickforO Feb 2016 #104
What's the word for when you promise something but then secretly do something else? Evolving? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2016 #107
Here is the link to the FTA email that is mentioned in the article... xocet Feb 2016 #108
Some of the posts in this thread should be studied for further evidence of the God Particle. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #110
The Higgs boson has spin 0. xocet Feb 2016 #150
Your post didn't get my post. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #157
I withdraw my unprovoked criticism (my apologies) and replace it with your civility. xocet Feb 2016 #164
Interesting stuff. Juicy_Bellows Feb 2016 #167
This message was self-deleted by its author TubbersUK Feb 2016 #113
K&R burrowowl Feb 2016 #114
Disgusting, but you know, this is who she is. Accept it. closeupready Feb 2016 #120
SO MANY JUST DON'T KNOW... AND SO ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #121
K&R CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #129
Kick... AzDar Feb 2016 #135
How many times does she have to be caught lieing FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #138
Another day... Got it Feb 2016 #139
she's totally compromised amborin Feb 2016 #141
Kickety... AzDar Feb 2016 #146
She is "currently" against TPP Arizona Roadrunner Feb 2016 #149
Nary A Word That HRC Says Can Be Trusted - HRC Is Owned By The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks cantbeserious Feb 2016 #152
It must be so emotionally and spiritually taxing LiberalLovinLug Feb 2016 #155
we should all send an email to Rachel about this BigBearJohn Feb 2016 #159
I TWEETED & EMAILED EVERYONE AT MSNBC BigBearJohn Feb 2016 #160
need more eyeballs... so kick! nt kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #161
K&R! This post has hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #168
Clinton is not 'out of woods' yet Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #169
She is so sleazy, there's just no end to it. Arugula Latte Feb 2016 #173
Get those emails and that deception out to Illinois, Indiana, Jarqui Feb 2016 #176
Trust me the TPP will be re-addressed if she becomes Pres. Wake up H supporters. YOHABLO Feb 2016 #181
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Emails: S...»Reply #129