Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
12. This is not how you fight. Clinton supporters would have unified. They would have had no choice.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:39 PM
Feb 2016

The Democrats would have begrudgingly unified behind Sanders, especially with Donald Trump as the alternative. His threat from the Clinton wing of the party was never the fact that they wouldn't support him in the General Election, it was the fact that they would have undermined him once in the White House. That is why you make a clear example of someone like DWS, to send a message to other Clintonites that if you step out of line, Sanders would mount your head on a wall as a trophy.

This is something I could never stand. Sanders constantly throws around the word Revolution, but it is the most milk-toast Revolution I have ever seen in my life. Revolutions are not civilized affairs, where people meekly discuss their differences. They are, by definition, an attempt to overthrow a ruling establishment. If successful, the old guard either falls in line or they get purged. This was the only way a Sanders Revolution, if successful, could have ended. Yet, it was clear to me from the moment he dropped the ball with DWS that he didn't have what it took to actually lead the liberal Revolution and take over of the Democratic Party. Therefore, had he been successful and become President, he ran the risk of setting back the broader movement.

One would have thought that Sanders, having lived through the 1960's, would at least be familiar with the work of Alinsky.

Why didn't Sanders demand DWS resign from the DNC, so that Gabbard could replace her? Meldread Feb 2016 #1
I don't wish Gabbard on Bernie, but hopefully Hortensis Feb 2016 #2
She is likely going to be Bernie's running mate. n/t FangedNoumenom Feb 2016 #4
Yes, I believe so as well. / FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #7
Her reputation isn't the best, you know. Hortensis Feb 2016 #9
You might be right, given Gabbard's hawkish positions FangedNoumenom Feb 2016 #11
I don't hate on ambition. Meldread Feb 2016 #8
Maybe Bernie's too smart to try to use a snake as a sword. Hortensis Feb 2016 #10
Sanders styles himself as the leader of a revolution. Revolutionaries use the weapons they have... Meldread Feb 2016 #13
I have a better opinion of Bernie than that HE Hortensis Feb 2016 #15
It's politics and Sanders is an insurgent. Meldread Feb 2016 #17
I stopped cold on the first line. Who is this faux left? Hortensis Feb 2016 #19
If you have a problem understanding, then my advice is to read the rest. Meldread Feb 2016 #21
Probably not to pick a fight at the DNC at a time when we can't be? That's my guess. silvershadow Feb 2016 #3
Wow, you mean Bernie isn't trying to alienate Hillary supporters? FangedNoumenom Feb 2016 #6
This is not how you fight. Clinton supporters would have unified. They would have had no choice. Meldread Feb 2016 #12
But wait . . Mike__M Feb 2016 #5
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said Bernie Sanders would bring 'peace and prosperity.' Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #14
She sounds tuned in. nt silvershadow Feb 2016 #16
K&R liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #18
She has to be positioning herself for something. After she first snubbed DWS, she was doing the WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #20
Yes, she is very well spoken. Meldread Feb 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC Vice-Chair Resigns, T...»Reply #12