HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » The ACA and the General E... » Reply #1
In the discussion thread: The ACA and the General Election [View all]

Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:38 PM

1. Not setting up a state exchange just defaults to the federal exchange which it better

 

for us anyway.

Now the Medicaid expansion is an issue, but the law was written where all states would have the expanded Medicaid for the poor. Then, the Supreme Court stepped in. That should be easier to figure out a way around, than scrapping the ACA and starting over with a single payer plan that is guaranteed to fail as long as 40+% of the populace is opposed to it (rightly or wrongly), and another good chunk of people -- who might be fine with a single payer system -- aren't going to believe it will be cheaper to them or better than what they have right now. It doesn't matter if single payer is better, too many people don't believe it is.

To me, a public option gets us there faster. Those that don't want to have their coverage changed can keep paying for it. Those that think a public option will be cheaper and better, can choose it. Overtime, if the public option is better, people will gravitate to it and what would essentially be single payer.

But, fighting for single payer will most likely end up with repeal of ACA and a crummy voucher system.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2016 OP
LineNew Reply Not setting up a state exchange just defaults to the federal exchange which it better
Hoyt Mar 2016 #1
Please login to view edit histories.