Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Pelosi pans superdelegate system [View all]SheenaR
(2,052 posts)10. Even simpler
So caucuses could remain if a state wanted to, why can't we go to a very simple. Most states won wins? Why is one state's vote more important? One of the great electoral college flaws and flaws of our system
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If they use superdelegates to win the primary they better have superdelegates to win the GE. nt
Xipe Totec
Mar 2016
#2
They are currently using superdelegates to manipulate the public to get the result they want.
stillwaiting
Mar 2016
#7
Ummmm Vermont is absolutely wonderful, and in my opinion, the best state in the country -
karynnj
Mar 2016
#21
Nancy and I agree. The superdelegate thing is nonsense, no matter who you're for now or the future
EndElectoral
Mar 2016
#13