2016 Postmortem

jcgoldie

(11,612 posts)

24. I find it ironic...

Fri Mar 4, 2016, 09:00 AM

Mar 2016

... that the same Sanders supporters who rail against superdelegates because they make the process less democratic (I agree with that point btw) are desperately hoping that the choice people will make for a nominee will be superseded by a legal issue that for the most part no-one would care about otherwise. All about being more democratic until it becomes evident that their guy wont be the one getting more votes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI Said to Prepare to Interview Clinton Aides About E-Mai [View all] NWCorona Mar 2016 OP

Yeah, the end phase. DCBob Mar 2016 #1

Even if they drop it 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #2

And like we've said before NWCorona Mar 2016 #6

"Investigators would also like to interview the Democratic presidential front-runner herself" Qutzupalotl Mar 2016 #3

Has there ever been a candidate who was compelled to talk to the FBI? NWCorona Mar 2016 #4

No. But a sitting President and his aides were. His Vice President went to prison. Richard Nixon. Lint Head Mar 2016 #28

That caught my eye too...that is definitely new. n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #10

Endless annoying scandal after scandal. DamnYankeeInHouston Mar 2016 #5

Let's just say that Bernie's the better candidate NWCorona Mar 2016 #7

I believe that Hillary Clinton is a corrupt liar demwing Mar 2016 #30

There are a handful of 'stages' in an investigation HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #8

Did they offer immunity to Pagliano? n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #11

Yes, but it's typical for immunity to be negotiated and that's interesting HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #12

He was her IT guy, as I recall, and set it all up. He was pretty high in the system, so they may libdem4life Mar 2016 #14

My understanding is Abedin had 3 sort-of-related jobs at once... HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #22

I wonder if she is still in that position with HRC....or should I say, any of those positions? n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #35

I have seen Abedin by Clinton's side after several debates. Sienna86 Mar 2016 #36

Maybe it's her the FBI has it's sights set on, ultimately? n/t libdem4life Mar 2016 #37

As i've said a dozen times now angrychair Mar 2016 #9

Brought to you by the guy who wants Apple to hack your iPhone. ucrdem Mar 2016 #13

I think he's pretty decent. 840high Mar 2016 #15

Yeah - the phase is called "the end" MaggieD Mar 2016 #16

Actually I don't want her to be indicated. I wouldn't wish that on anyone! NWCorona Mar 2016 #17

So stop encouraging the Faux Scandals ginned up by GOPers MaggieD Mar 2016 #18

Ok I'll make a promise to you. NWCorona Mar 2016 #19

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #20

LOL - yeah, dog forbid somebody push back on the BS MaggieD Mar 2016 #21

Ok, ok, have a good one.... andrewv1 Mar 2016 #23

That was a cheap shot at Maggy but I am not surprised . DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #34

I find it ironic... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #24

I think that's a false equivalence NWCorona Mar 2016 #25

+1 Jarqui Mar 2016 #26

Because they know in their bones their flailing candidate could never beat her stg8 up. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #33

It will be interesting as to who is willing to talk with them without immunity. Jarqui Mar 2016 #27

According to "unnamed sources" as usual. MineralMan Mar 2016 #29

One way or the other, this needs to be cleared up sooner the better pdsimdars Mar 2016 #31

Agreed! NWCorona Mar 2016 #32