Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)

4. Feelin' it brother.

Reply to VulgarPoet (Reply #2)

Thu Mar 10, 2016, 11:46 AM

Mar 2016

It's a delicate subject, but one that needs to be (carefully) discussed.

Does one take the frying pan over the fire if it might help to speed up the deconstruction of a system that is already crumbling at both ends?

And is there another way to speed the process up? Or can we truly have the best of everything and subvert the system by participating in it?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It�s OK to reject the choice of a tyrannical liberal or a right-wing tyrant [View all] TalkingDog Mar 2016 OP

Only 120 views? TalkingDog Mar 2016 #1

Preach. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #2

Feelin' it brother. TalkingDog Mar 2016 #4

I wholeheartedly believe in fire. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #5

Been doing that for 40 years. I'm pretty sure it's gotten worse. TalkingDog Mar 2016 #6

This piece is the best thing I have read this morning so far! m-lekktor Mar 2016 #3

Tyrannical liberal=oxymoron, Is this from the JBS? Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #7

Nah, some egghead intellectual TalkingDog Mar 2016 #8

I think calling an ideologue an intellectul is like calling a sloth a racehorse. Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #9

Telling people they can choose what they want to do does not fall under ideology TalkingDog Mar 2016 #10