Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Susan Sarandon is the perfect face of the Bernie or Bust movement. [View all]LexVegas
(6,059 posts)44. Does Clooney attack civil rights icons outside polling places? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
179 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She's the face of L'oreal, which has a terrible track record, including, but not limited to, child
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#152
The Face of L'Oreal, same for Clinton stumper, actress Eva Longoria & other women, for the record.
appalachiablue
Mar 2016
#175
I think successful people are great. But I like them more when they also care about less successful
DanTex
Mar 2016
#5
Apparently they can be as rich as God, but Bernie will say it is "obscene" if they spend their
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#14
They can be successful and act in the best interest of the country too no? tia
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#96
She can support SBS all she wants. Is her callousness about a Trump presidency which makes her
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#156
Bernie is anti-corporate but Sarandon is well paid for shilling for corporations
brush
Mar 2016
#163
My mistake. If you're looking for a hip night of ping-pong in NYC, I recommend it!
DanTex
Mar 2016
#12
And George Clooney lives on a backwoods commune and is poor, AA and is never trendy?
Armstead
Mar 2016
#8
Neither is she. ...She is trying to get Bernie elected. I guess you missed that part
Armstead
Mar 2016
#13
That's admirable. It's not nearly as much good work as the Clintons have done for people all over
DanTex
Mar 2016
#82
Cloney doesn't think there's anything positive about Trump, Susan does though
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#97
That's irrelevant to the point of whether they both are privileged rich celebrities
Armstead
Mar 2016
#100
It's relevant to your post I'm replying to, Cloney isn't stating anything positive about Trump
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#108
"People who are considering helping Trump become president aren't progressives."
anothergreenbus
Mar 2016
#179
Two different galaxies there, Armstead...He said the differences between Bush and Gore were nothing
BeyondGeography
Mar 2016
#63
On issues of coporateate power and encouraging citizen involvement to balance that.....
Armstead
Mar 2016
#66
"His message and life's work is exactly what many DUers have claimed to want over the years."
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#74
Seriously? "not a dimes worth of difference" between Gore and Bush? What a fool
redstateblues
Mar 2016
#75
Tinfoil Naderite that clearly illustrated the reasons that her 'side' can't win last night.
onehandle
Mar 2016
#21
She's smart enough to not advocate for letting Trump win because revolution.
Starry Messenger
Mar 2016
#38
DanTex promote Trump in any way? No?! well, I'll take that over what Susan did
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#101
CR leaders who launch spurious wrongheaded attacks on the supporters of another candidate?
Armstead
Mar 2016
#47
Thats another one that helped Bernie get to low double digits with African Americans.
LexVegas
Mar 2016
#62
The beautiful thing about it all is that we shall see who the better candidate is.
LexVegas
Mar 2016
#71
No Armstead, there's much more to being a civil rights leader than just speaking about what's right
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#109
The site is for dedicated Democrats, not those who will sometimes, but not necessarily always,
MoonRiver
Mar 2016
#121
Except for advocating not voting for the Democratic nominee. That crosses a line.
MoonRiver
Mar 2016
#136
she's a privileged Naderite. That says it all. "not a dime's worth of difference"?
redstateblues
Mar 2016
#81
Quite the opposite. I would expect progressives to care about problems that affect other people
DanTex
Mar 2016
#86
Whereas, Hillary is rich, white, and doesn't own a trendy night club.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#87
Yes she is. Did you see the Chris Hayes interview? She thinks Trump would be better because
DanTex
Mar 2016
#90
It's a zero sum game. There are two options in the general. Hillary's loss is Trump's gain.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#120
Third party candidates are a wasted vote. It's either D or R. Not voting D is helping the R.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#124
Because they can't possibly win. Not voting D is one net vote for the R. Voting R is two.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#128
The math is simple. The effect of a non-vote is one more net R vote than a D vote.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#140
Funny you're accusing me of demanding purity of all things. While at the same time throwing
DanTex
Mar 2016
#146
I'm saying that not casting one's vote to thwart Trump's ascendancy is idiotic.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#154
So, demanding that people vote for Hillary is not based on any beliefs? Just a hunch?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#160
It's not a demand, just a comment. I've always said that you have the right to vote for Trump
DanTex
Mar 2016
#162
Divine Punishment, the new blockbuster starring Skinner as God and hrmjustin as Jonah.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#131
I grew up in church, Justin. I know what I know when I see it. Thanks.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#134
Sarandon is the epitome of white privilege. It makes sense she would say Trump is
R B Garr
Mar 2016
#132
And, poor, poverty stricken, humble Hillary is the nadir of White Privilege.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#147
Oh, please. Anti-Hillary spam is not the answer to everything. Hillary doesn't put herself
R B Garr
Mar 2016
#149
She's a leftist who sees the establishment an dominance of the two parties as harmful.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#153
odd, when one can thinks of the face of rich, white, and privileged
thebeautifulstruggle
Mar 2016
#144