2016 Postmortem

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)

19. Her favorables peaked after she got out of the 2008 race

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:13 AM

Mar 2016

They stay relatively good until she starts demanding to be the nominee again:

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a thought and requesting input from all sides. [View all] floriduck Mar 2016 OP

The Republican Party has spent millions over decades to smear her. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1

There is no doubt about that. Thanks. floriduck Mar 2016 #3

Waste of money SheenaR Mar 2016 #29

You're uninformed and naive. You don't know the history. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #31

Lol SheenaR Mar 2016 #32

There are plenty of books that have documented the Right wing's efforts to destroy her. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #34

That's a great question hereforthevoting Mar 2016 #2

Short Answer: How dare you!!! She is victim of RW smears. Long Answer... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #4

No question RW smears have occurred repeatedly as log as she has been in the public's eye. KPN Mar 2016 #30

Personal style is a turnoff? Does this mean Sanders turns you on? bettyellen Mar 2016 #41

Fundmentally, America does not want another Clinton or Bush Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #5

The media focused more on her earlier. But then it seems floriduck Mar 2016 #7

Right marions ghost Mar 2016 #15

I don't think her supporters do much on the national stage overall. JackInGreen Mar 2016 #6

I'm sure this person felt intimidated by the sheer numbers floriduck Mar 2016 #8

that's possible JackInGreen Mar 2016 #10

I've been thinking about this firebrand80 Mar 2016 #9

I hadn't considered that. Thanks for that input. floriduck Mar 2016 #11

That is a steaming pile of excrement... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #12

You just kinda proved my point nt firebrand80 Mar 2016 #14

Perhaps considering that some of the "hate" revbones Mar 2016 #28

I like and respect people here who I vehemently disagree with about some things. bettyellen Mar 2016 #42

Doubt it. Individual people, voters and delegates at least, wouldn't be denting too much VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #13

Can only speak for myself demwing Mar 2016 #16

More than likely the actions of BS supporters are helping increase her negative. Think SS. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #17

I stared off this cycle more accepting of Hillary than most Bernie voters are and now I do not care Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #18

Her favorables peaked after she got out of the 2008 race GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #19

2013 is 5 years removed from the 2008 primary. You're thinking of during and after her term at State CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #24

Look at the early spike in this line, from 54% to 65% GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #26

My negative opinion of her is strictly HER. The more I researched, IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #20

The negatives belong to her, not her supporters. Punkingal Mar 2016 #21

It's the sexism, stupid. (A paraphrase of the famous quote, not an insult.) CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #22

I think the high unfavorables are virtually all Hillary BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #23

Plus her total lack of any sort of charisma thrown in. Vinca Mar 2016 #25

I'd rather see bland and condescending Hillary BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #33

Pointing at imaginary people. ROFL. Vinca Mar 2016 #37

By and large, I think the Brits tend to be more reserved. Buns_of_Fire Mar 2016 #38

*screams in horror* MisterP Mar 2016 #40

I do not like Hillary as a candidate because of issues. djean111 Mar 2016 #27

No. Her unfavorability is due to having been caught in a pattern of dishonesty, cover up, blame Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #35

The Clintons have spent literally decades cultivating an adversarial and antagonistic ... salinsky Mar 2016 #36

25 years of RW smears coupled with ... JoePhilly Mar 2016 #39