Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
49. Fracking .........
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie and Hillary and Fracking:

https://vimeo.com/157982054


*********************************************************************

(and how she didn't appear to consider much at all those 'conditions' peddling it to other nations)


How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World

A trove of secret documents details the US government's global push for shale gas.

—By Mariah Blake | September/October 2014 Issue

ONE ICY MORNING in February 2012, Hillary Clinton's plane touched down in the Bulgarian capital, Sofia, which was just digging out from a fierce blizzard. Wrapped in a thick coat, the secretary of state descended the stairs to the snow-covered tarmac, where she and her aides piled into a motorcade bound for the presidential palace. That afternoon, they huddled with Bulgarian leaders, including Prime Minister Boyko Borissov, discussing everything from Syria's bloody civil war to their joint search for loose nukes. But the focus of the talks was fracking. The previous year, Bulgaria had signed a five-year, $68 million deal, granting US oil giant Chevron millions of acres in shale gas concessions. Bulgarians were outraged. Shortly before Clinton arrived, tens of thousands of protesters poured into the streets carrying placards that read "Stop fracking with our water" and "Chevron go home." Bulgaria's parliament responded by voting overwhelmingly for a fracking moratorium.


Clinton urged Bulgarian officials to give fracking another chance. According to Borissov, she agreed to help fly in the "best specialists on these new technologies to present the benefits to the Bulgarian people." But resistance only grew. The following month in neighboring Romania, thousands of people gathered to protest another Chevron fracking project, and Romania's parliament began weighing its own shale gas moratorium. Again Clinton intervened, dispatching her special envoy for energy in Eurasia, Richard Morningstar, to push back against the fracking bans. The State Depart­ment's lobbying effort culminated in late May 2012, when Morningstar held a series of meetings on fracking with top Bulgarian and Romanian officials. He also touted the technology in an interview on Bulgarian national radio, saying it could lead to a fivefold drop in the price of natural gas. A few weeks later, Romania's parliament voted down its proposed fracking ban and Bulgaria's eased its moratorium.



Hillary Clinton is welcomed to Sofia by Bulgarian Foreign Affairs Minister Nikolay Mladenov, left. US Department of State/flickr

Goldwyn had a long history of promoting drilling overseas—both as a Department of Energy official under Bill Clinton and as a representative of the oil industry. From 2005 to 2009 he directed the US-Libya Business Association, an organization funded primarily by US oil companies—including Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and Marathon—clamoring to tap Libya's abundant supply. Goldwyn lobbied Congress for pro-Libyan policies and even battled legislation that would have allowed families of the Lockerbie bombing victims to sue the Libyan government for its alleged role in the attack.


But environmental groups were barely consulted, while industry played a crucial role. When Goldwyn unveiled the initiative in April 2010, it was at a meeting of the United States Energy Association, a trade organization representing Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and ConocoPhillips, all of which were pursuing fracking overseas. Among their top targets was Poland, which preliminary studies suggested had abundant shale gas. The day after Goldwyn's announcement, the US Embassy in Warsaw helped organize a shale gas conference, underwritten by these same companies (plus the oil field services company Halliburton) and attended by officials from the departments of State and Energy.


http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/10/how-hillary-clintons-state-department-sold-fracking-to-the-world
Natural gas is the logical bridge fuel to renewables. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1
We don't need a bridge fuel... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #2
That's not going to happen. Why can't we be realistic here ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #4
Why not we spent Trillions on a war that we never should have gotten into... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #5
Because you don't have anything close to the votes in Congress for something so radical. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #7
Does the EPA need Congress authority to author new rules? GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #9
They need a Supreme Court that will uphold those EPA rules. That's very much in doubt right now. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #24
Not if Sanders gets the election... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #29
You seem quite eager to keep the status quo. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #10
There are Republican billionaires that bought that Congress. They're stronger than the bully pulpit Trust Buster Mar 2016 #25
Well, we need to start somewhere, no? Apparently you think not. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #27
Sure we need to start but we're 20 years behind the Koch machine. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #30
So we should elect Hillary Clinton so she can go along with the Wall St./Koch playbook? Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #32
The sad truth is that, until we organize and fund a comparable political machine, the next Trust Buster Mar 2016 #33
That's Hillary's game. Get funding from corporations, and then do their bidding. Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #34
That's what we're currently up against. The Legislative Branch has been shut down by some of Trust Buster Mar 2016 #60
Don't blame it all on Republicans... There are many DINOs in Congress... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #62
New York State disagreed Armstead Mar 2016 #11
unless fossil fuel corporations lobbyists are whispering in your ear TheDormouse Mar 2016 #61
Ah, a Hill supporter all lined up behind fracking. senz Mar 2016 #16
To my surprise, I also heard Al Franken defending fracking a while back. nt NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #3
Fracking needs to be regulated better but still beats the heck out of coal. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #6
I suppose, fuck the drinking water NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #8
You must have missed my "better regulated" part. Everything doesn't have to be all or nothing. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #26
Yeah, and so what if Oklahoma now has more earthquakes than California? Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #12
I had to google that to be sure... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #15
So destructive it destabilizes the very ground on which people live and work. senz Mar 2016 #17
really?.... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #28
Well Al is still endorsing Hillary. However, considering our jwirr Mar 2016 #23
Problem with that is, right now, if it's not natural gas, it's coal, which is much worse. DanTex Mar 2016 #13
Smell that? HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #31
Do you disagree that natural gas is cleaner than coal? DanTex Mar 2016 #36
"cleaner"... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #37
I agree... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #38
I'm stunned... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #39
Yes. It produces slightly over half as much CO2 per unit of energy as coal. DanTex Mar 2016 #41
WOW, just wow... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #42
I'm citing government emissions figures. Half as much CO2. If you're really amazed DanTex Mar 2016 #43
magical gas... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #45
Natural gas. And it burns cleaner than coll. DanTex Mar 2016 #46
DanTex.... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #47
I'd say you're in the wrong party. And you're also woefully uninformed when it comes to DanTex Mar 2016 #48
then why do you avoid the scientific facts?.... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #50
The scientific fact is that natural gas produces about half the CO2 of coal. DanTex Mar 2016 #51
avoidance of ALL the environmental facts relating to natural gas... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #52
You're the one doing that. You don't even understand the very reason that Obama is DanTex Mar 2016 #53
Geesus H. Christicicle... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #54
The all-caps don't cover up your ignorance of the fundamental environmental issues here. DanTex Mar 2016 #55
You make this too easy... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #56
I'm trying to make it easy for you, but you're seem impervious to scientific facts. DanTex Mar 2016 #57
Lost cause, last reply... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #63
That's great about Germany. Of course, this is the US. DanTex Mar 2016 #64
And Hillary's position is conditional. She has a "grown up" view about fracking. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #14
Mommy, the bad man is disagreeing with me again! Buns_of_Fire Mar 2016 #18
I tried to stop it and failed. Never going to happen. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #19
You forgot the campaign contributions too GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #21
fracking is insane questionseverything Mar 2016 #20
Only complete idiots, or greedy jerks with no regard for the environment, could Zorra Mar 2016 #22
Gregorian, better watch your "tone" casperthegm Mar 2016 #35
I wish she would get there with fracking. bettyellen Mar 2016 #40
This MUST go viral in New York State ASAP Autumn Colors Mar 2016 #44
Fracking ......... polly7 Mar 2016 #49
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #58
It's ok. Kentonio Mar 2016 #59
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Unlike Clinton, I Think F...»Reply #49