Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
51. Utterly Unrealistic
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:10 AM
Mar 2016

I've asked many times for someone to use one of the delegate calculators to demonstrate how Sanders could acquire a majority of pledged delegates. Finally someone has done so, but it's nowhere close to realistic.

8-point victory in NY, 12-point victory in NJ, and a 16-point victory in both PA and CA? Only a 10-point loss in MD and only a 16-point loss in Wash. D.C.?

Could one of those things happen? I suppose. All of them? No.

And even then Sanders just barely takes the lead.

... onehandle Mar 2016 #1
That appears so for Hillary NWCorona Mar 2016 #4
What is remarkable is that he shaved 100 delegates in a few days and just a few contests. morningfog Mar 2016 #2
Not really. hack89 Mar 2016 #5
He's making the road less impossible with his landslides against the front runner. morningfog Mar 2016 #7
He needs landslides in big states hack89 Mar 2016 #9
No he doesn't need a landslide in a big state. He needs wins in big states to be sure and morningfog Mar 2016 #11
He needs landslide victories simply to get the delegates he needs hack89 Mar 2016 #16
Her lead is 228 delegates. He needs 56.5% of the remaining delegates. morningfog Mar 2016 #21
She needs 44%. She could lose every remaining state and still be the nominee. hack89 Mar 2016 #49
Lol, of course it's easier. morningfog Mar 2016 #50
That chart should scare the hell out of any Bernie supporter. hack89 Mar 2016 #3
No fear. It is what it is. morningfog Mar 2016 #8
I think it looks pretty promising. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #10
Based on what understanding of the electorate? hack89 Mar 2016 #12
I think we've learned that the polls have been way off. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #15
Not really hack89 Mar 2016 #18
as have the prognosticators reddread Mar 2016 #25
Time... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #20
All that matters is the number of delegates. That is all. hack89 Mar 2016 #22
yeah, sure... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #23
Yet polls for previous and subsequent states were accurate hack89 Mar 2016 #24
my point... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #26
And Hillary only needs to win 44% to win. hack89 Mar 2016 #27
Agree to disagree... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #30
+1 CountAllVotes Mar 2016 #31
agreed! HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #32
You like 538, huh? Spin this. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #33
OK, I'll take that challenge... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #34
You're so scared you're quoting out of context. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #36
Incorrect... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #37
Oh, so you're a professional cherry-picker then? Not surprising. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #38
Try again... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #39
Nate's words: "These are not predictions." Try reading the whole article. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #41
I did... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #42
Nate's words: "These are not predictions." Everything after is an argumentative ASSUMPTION CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #43
Ugh... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #45
Also of note, the Arizona number will change in Bernies favor slightly. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #6
They are counting the provisional ballots in AZ? Please tell me! thereismore Mar 2016 #14
I've been tracking it here... bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #17
That's really great. Thanks to everyone who stayed thereismore Mar 2016 #28
+1 strategery blunder Mar 2016 #52
I think he will be "in the green" after WI but then all eyes are on NY. He needs to win with 54%, thereismore Mar 2016 #13
K&R amborin Mar 2016 #19
Basically according to that site, he has to win almost every contest Renew Deal Mar 2016 #29
Some hilarious stuff right there Tarc Mar 2016 #35
He is not even going to get 44% in NY let alone 54% hrmjustin Mar 2016 #40
Now there's a wonderful piece of dishonesty. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2016 #44
That clearly shows how impossible it is for Bernie to win. DCBob Mar 2016 #46
Chart ignores super delegates Gothmog Mar 2016 #47
This is not correct. Bernie needs to win 56.5% of remaining delegates, not 58%. jg10003 Mar 2016 #48
Utterly Unrealistic Garrett78 Mar 2016 #51
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Awesome chart for Bernie'...»Reply #51