Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This whole Vatican thing has been hilarious [View all]hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)20. Some are paid to post here
Here's their pattern:
Their responses are all garbage--either smug comments, repetition of outright lies, or occasionally graphics (though that's uncommon on this board). If you try to engage in conversation with them they'll either be intentionally obtuse or just drop it and move on.
They generally move as a group and stick to one another's threads. So you'll see a swarm of similar posts in a short window, all full of activity to keep them at the top.
They generally stick to their own threads. You'll see them all over one another's threads, but authentic threads generally get ignored. For example, none have bothered with these: 1 2 3
If one pops into an authentic thread, the rest tend to swarm in and smear themselves all over it.
It's the same pattern in discussion boards all over the internet. They're like cancer--looks kinda like the normal content, but if you take a little longer view then the edges of the tumor become apparent. I keep a list of repeat offenders handy and it's always a small number of "users" posting massive volumes and sticking to the pattern. Super PACs buy this sort of behavior. reddit's /r/HillaryClinton sub is really infested and the spillover from there has ruined /r/PoliticalDiscussion.
Try it yourself: see who around here fits that pattern and start making a list. Draw a digraph of who replies to whose threads and the cancer will become obvious very quickly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's call them Hill-bullies. "-bro" is a sexist suffix. They may sink to that level, but we
Betty Karlson
Apr 2016
#14
I think that term is perfect but I actually got hidden for using it a few days ago.
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#31
Better update with the latest - Bernie ambushed the Pope!!1! It wasn't planned!!!1!
riderinthestorm
Apr 2016
#2
You're not kidding! There's even a thread with five Rec's claiming he never met with the Pope
lostnfound
Apr 2016
#23
Support of a candidate had no degrees of freedom...a ding on one is support for the other.
HereSince1628
Apr 2016
#3
They're serving crow for breakfast at Camp Weathervane and it's not going down too well.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#9
The latest? In that five minutes that the Pope spoke with him, Bernie was supposed to reverse the
djean111
Apr 2016
#10
What's funny is that the Pope may not have intended to meet with Bernie until he found
brewens
Apr 2016
#13
I think you are absolutely correct. As I stated before the Pope is a very savvy guy. I love it!.nt
monmouth4
Apr 2016
#15
There's a card game, called Poo, featuring monkeys that look like that.
winter is coming
Apr 2016
#37
I have seen a lot of people get very, very angry this season over ridiculous things.
ScreamingMeemie
Apr 2016
#34
it's not every day I get to bust this out, but we're gonna be needing it soon if
MisterP
Apr 2016
#46
People who are posting like that are ugly, nasty, pathetic excuses for human beings.
cui bono
Apr 2016
#49