Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 04:45 AM Apr 2016

FBI's Clinton probe expands to public corruption track [View all]

The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.

This new investigative track is in addition to the focus on classified material found on Clinton’s personal server.

"The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed," one source said.

Clinton, speaking to the Des Moines Register, on Monday pushed back on the details of a second investigative track. According to reporter Jennifer Jacobs, Clinton said Monday she has heard nothing from the FBI.

more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/11/fbis-clinton-probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html

-----------------

Anyone know if this is still an active part of the investigation? I can't keep up...

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
.. berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #1
I would dearly hope they are looking into possible quid pro quo.... It does reek peacebird Apr 2016 #2
Listen, Im not backing down. She needs to step aside, immediately, and I have called for it silvershadow Apr 2016 #4
Not going to read any of this anymore Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #21
and impeachment will start day one 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #33
Oh, you post anything and everything about this and you say you can't keep up!! riversedge Apr 2016 #3
And you deny that there's even a conflict of interest. Scuba Apr 2016 #13
But they wear such a pretty shade of blinders. ChairmanAgnostic Apr 2016 #18
intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News GreydeeThos Apr 2016 #5
Please.. you know she's as crooked as they come.. the berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #8
They were so poor when they left the White House they had to eat hot dogs silvershadow Apr 2016 #17
Hillary's own bad judgement put her in this position. She chose to not use government silvershadow Apr 2016 #10
Then it has to be true! Arneoker Apr 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Apr 2016 #6
" I can't keep up..." NCTraveler Apr 2016 #7
I love that people have to go to Fox, Citizens United, etc to attack Hillary Renew Deal Apr 2016 #9
Breaking! Kber Apr 2016 #11
That it broke at all should be a concern. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #16
Anonymous sources. Fox "News" Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
It's easy to keep up...log into Free Republic or listen to Rush on the radio.... Sancho Apr 2016 #14
LOL. What a load! merrily Apr 2016 #20
denial and projection... you know there is treatment for that! Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #29
But...first you have to admit there's a problem. Catch 22 when the problem is denial. merrily Apr 2016 #34
This was Jan. 11, 2016. I didn't even know about this report. Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #15
My two favorite reporters on this did a story on March 31, 2016. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #22
Your favorire reporters are on FoxNews? obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #27
My two favorite reporters on THIS. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #31
Need. More. Chicken. Yodeling. randome Apr 2016 #23
hahaha obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #25
lolz obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #24
I hear they're working in Whitewater and the murder of Vince Foster too. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #26
You are citing Fox News? apcalc Apr 2016 #28
This is embarrassing, even for a BS Cheerleader. Faux "News"? Really? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #30
I would think it is an issue and track since people involved were on multiple payrolls. mmonk Apr 2016 #32
Hey buddy... Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2016 #35
Certainly not very creative or substantive in our responses are we? pdsimdars Apr 2016 #37
I call it like I see it. Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2016 #41
I have wanted to use this response to the right wing propaganda so many times! JTFrog Apr 2016 #39
I saw the date on that article. Just as I thought, it's old becasue they've been onto that pdsimdars Apr 2016 #36
Oh boy, more FauX news humping. JTFrog Apr 2016 #38
It is far more than Clinton Foundation Work. Millions were paid directly to Bill Clinton while his Skwmom Apr 2016 #40
Yes indeed, that is also correct. They don't want to hear any more about it and wish silvershadow Apr 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FBI's Clinton probe expan...»Reply #0