Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
15. I agree this is absolutely slander per se.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:21 AM
Mar 2012

slam dunk for her. Even better for the plaintiff than ordinary slander.

In slander per se cases, damages are assumed to be assessed against the defendants, and do not have to be proven by the plaintiff, because the slander is in an especially egregious class.

Her testimony had nothing to do with sexual activity at all. It was about a friend of hers who needed BC pills as a hormonal treatment and eventually lost an ovary b/c she could not get them covered by Georgetown University.

Yes I am a lawyer but I do not play one on TV like Spader.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sandra Fluke needs to sue...»Reply #15