Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
27. Do you really want an answer?
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:55 PM
Apr 2016

Or are you just using rhetorical questions to put that movement down?

On the off chance that you really want an answer, I'll give you what I've got. I don't speak for the movement or the revolution, just myself.

I am one of a number of people that have been disenfranchised by my own party during the neo-liberal takeover of the Democratic Party. Those not affiliated with partisan politics: independents and small 3rd parties with little power saw it first, the slowly building erosion of progressive values and support for the 99% within government and the Democratic party. For a long time, we were just discounted as "fringe" and tossed under the bus when it came to political representation.

Some people spoke up, and were made pariahs.

Then, though, as neo-liberal policies continued the destruction of the 99% begun under Ronald Reagan, and more and more people were disenfranchised, there began to be a rumbling.

We saw it in the response to the IWR and the Patriot Act, and those who turned out to protest, and were ignored. Of course, we could blame all of that on Republicans since it happened under the illegitimate GWB administration. No matter how many neo-liberals and other scared Congressional Democrats jumped on to the war and security bandwagon; people's fear was used against them.

We saw it further in the occupy movement, which lasted a very long time and was more public than tptb would have preferred before going more underground.

Then the primary season began. For myself I can say that I didn't really care WHO stepped up to the plate, as long as someone who was not a neo-liberal DID. Anyone. They are getting rarer and rarer within the party. I just didn't want to be faced with more neo-liberal choices that I couldn't, in good conscience, support. I wanted some hope.

When it was Sanders, I was fine with that. I wasn't holding out for Warren or anyone else. I just wanted SOMEONE. Sanders stepped in, and he's done an amazing job. He's run a powerful campaign and connected with all of us who are sick of neo-liberalism and corporate control of our government. In the beginning, I just wanted someone to represent me, so that I could vote FOR someone instead of AGAINST someone. That rarely happens. Then, the campaign did so amazingly well that I actually began to hope that we had a chance. That's my experience.

As far as "movement" and "revolution" goes? The Sanders campaign is a natural continuation of OWS. Win or lose, the sentiment, the anger, the determination, and the movement has been there before his campaign, and it will continue after.

With or without the Democratic Party.

I'm one who thinks that it is a fundamental error for the Party to have worked so hard to put that movement down. It renders them, at best, irrelevant, and at worst, an enemy of that movement. Beating it out of the party in 2016 will be costly in the long run, because it's not going away.

That's my answer, fwiw.

Bernie's ego and Tad and Jeff's wallet. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #1
Bernie has the smallest ego of any politician I have ever seen or heard of. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #7
His "we'll see" comment belies that small ego claim uponit7771 Apr 2016 #29
DDS+WDS frylock Apr 2016 #56
It's not a movement. CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #2
Gee, maybe they didn't know him? Or maybe they did, and they did not feel he represented things merrily Apr 2016 #13
+1, they don't even support the ones that are on their side 100% !!! It's like they're just in it uponit7771 Apr 2016 #32
It was all about Nader, Then Dennis Kucinich, Then it was all about Howard Dean... onehandle Apr 2016 #3
Most of those people are now currently under the bus. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #5
Additionally, if you think that the 'Bernie Sanders Movement' is a thing... onehandle Apr 2016 #9
I wrote an op about the Clinton/Kucinich problem progressives experience but deleted it. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #17
Cult of personality politics. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #4
I guess ... salinsky Apr 2016 #11
Absolutely right ... KPN Apr 2016 #24
This is a problem on both sides tymorial Apr 2016 #41
#I'mWithHER frylock Apr 2016 #61
I'd say he's now just savalez Apr 2016 #6
DU's Hillary's supporters made it all about Bernie and only Bernie. merrily Apr 2016 #8
That's exactly what I've observed, merrily. polly7 Apr 2016 #12
Every time someone nyah nyahed me about his losing a primary, I just posted something merrily Apr 2016 #23
Those were both great threads. polly7 Apr 2016 #39
Thanks so much for a great post, polly7! merrily Apr 2016 #43
...... polly7 Apr 2016 #44
Thanks for those posts merrily LiberalLovinLug Apr 2016 #78
My pleasure. merrily Apr 2016 #80
Well said. KPN Apr 2016 #22
Sanders "we'll see" comment about supporting down ballot dems made it about Bernie uponit7771 Apr 2016 #33
Judging by the votes he's not getting and the delegates he's not amassing, stopbush Apr 2016 #10
Riiiight Because a movement always starts with a establishment support and a majority. smh merrily Apr 2016 #31
So Sanders ran as an independent? tia uponit7771 Apr 2016 #35
Even if the movement is good, Bernie isn't the messenger. stopbush Apr 2016 #51
Well, the way to frame the discussion is forjusticethunders Apr 2016 #66
Excellent OP. The hard work must be done at the grass roots first. Not with a 74 year old. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #14
You have the Party Machine astroturf and a 69 year-old candidate. frylock Apr 2016 #63
You would probably have to listen to his speeches... Orsino Apr 2016 #15
Sanders "we'll see" comment about supporting down ballot dems tells people more than his website uponit7771 Apr 2016 #37
We will indeed see. Orsino Apr 2016 #42
That's the point, no need to go to a tank fight with a base ball bat even if you don't like tanks uponit7771 Apr 2016 #47
There's a movement gollygee Apr 2016 #16
Well stated! n/t Blaukraut Apr 2016 #19
Very level headed post ... salinsky Apr 2016 #70
Actually, there is a movement or, more accurately, several movements. MineralMan Apr 2016 #18
Good post ... enjoyed reading it ... thanks! nt salinsky Apr 2016 #21
This should be its own thread, MM n/t Blaukraut Apr 2016 #25
Done. Link: MineralMan Apr 2016 #46
Very good post. Thanks, MM. Hortensis Apr 2016 #53
Legitimate questions. KPN Apr 2016 #20
Thank heaven Occupy disappeared without a trace! merrily Apr 2016 #28
Why do you laugh/scoff at Occupy? KPN Apr 2016 #36
Um, I am not the one who scoffed at Occupy. YOUR post said merrily Apr 2016 #40
Haha. Good to know. So two misunderstandings here ... KPN Apr 2016 #59
Bernie is the messenger Kokonoe Apr 2016 #26
Do you really want an answer? LWolf Apr 2016 #27
Good post. 840high Apr 2016 #67
Thanks for the substantive response ... salinsky Apr 2016 #69
The Down Ballot Dems aren't "pure" enough for Senator "we'll see" Sanders so why support most of em? uponit7771 Apr 2016 #30
This is why I couldn't get behind his candidacy ... salinsky Apr 2016 #71
I give Bernie credit for being a leader...and not an ego Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #34
The true test of Bernie's movement will be redstateblues Apr 2016 #38
you could ask the same of Clinton - is it really all about her? DebDoo Apr 2016 #45
She raises money for down ballot Dems-Bernie? Hardly redstateblues Apr 2016 #48
Because all Hillary can contribute is money? How about putting your mouth where your money is? DebDoo Apr 2016 #50
She washes money through down-ticket Dems. frylock Apr 2016 #64
A lot of energy... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #49
I sure hope it is a movement. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #52
There room for pathos and action. aikoaiko Apr 2016 #54
Considering SheenaR Apr 2016 #55
#I'mWithHER frylock Apr 2016 #57
He's become the focal point of a lot of existing "movements" -- He did not arise from a vacuum. Armstead Apr 2016 #58
This is certainly true .... salinsky Apr 2016 #72
Clinton's 'me' versus Sanders' 'us' frylock Apr 2016 #60
There's bowel movement in this OP whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #62
The movement was already here. And, it's not going away. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #65
Yep. 840high Apr 2016 #68
Bernie did not launch Occupy Wall Street. Bernie did not launch Draft Warren. ieoeja Apr 2016 #73
No, I haven't ... nt salinsky Apr 2016 #77
Yeah, it's a "movement" all right. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #74
Sounds like.... 99Forever Apr 2016 #75
It's about us not wanting to be watered-down Republicans. Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #76
"Simple" is correct .... nt salinsky Apr 2016 #79
It was never about Bernie. It's about the truth, and Bernie happens to be one of the main ... Scuba Apr 2016 #81
first a revolution, then a movement, soon to be an asterisk DrDan Apr 2016 #82
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is there really a "moveme...»Reply #27