Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ok then, Let's spell it out for Sanders "Democrats" [View all]Orsino
(37,428 posts)10. Should we expect Clinton to head down the chained-CPI path, then?
Or is socialism okay, after all?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You should read:Seymour Lipset’s ,Gary Marks’ book It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed i USA
factfinder_77
May 2016
#4
He was accepted by the Democratic Party and millions of Dems voted for him ...get real
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#9
we have to keep explaining because Hillary's surrogates keep promoting otherwise
azurnoir
May 2016
#17
"African American voters, elderly voters, women, independents, and moderate republicans does not..."
TCJ70
May 2016
#19
More of the same Brock bullshit and the mythical math and the ubiquitous sense of entitlement.
Betty Karlson
May 2016
#20
Some fucking clown with 8 hides in less than a month and a couple hundred posts...
99Forever
May 2016
#24
You're confused. The nominee can't win without the 39% of the public who are independents.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#42
You pretty pompous for a poster here less than a month who has so many hides already
Bluenorthwest
May 2016
#47