Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Reason Why Dozens of Lobbyists Will Be Democratic Presidential Delegates [View all]Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)6. Like the banks, "fraud as a business model".
We've got institutionalized fraud everywhere we look, but there's nothing to worry about. It's all a nothingburger. It's a lot like that movie, "Alien", with the mama alien and all the lesser ones running around...
And that Dem President honoring Kissinger thing, that didn't indicate anything either. I'm sure the next war we're in will have nothing to do with it... him... them.
Candidates above the law? Not a problem. We Dems have it all under control, so we're told. Pay-to-play in the State Department? I can't hear you. Didn't they used to call that graft in the olden days?
Voting irregularities? That's just an artful smear.
But we're out there "fighting for YOU" every day! So it's all good!!!!!
Yay!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Reason Why Dozens of Lobbyists Will Be Democratic Presidential Delegates [View all]
eridani
May 2016
OP
Bullshit, I'm active and am always called to help. I get my one vote, no more.
TheKentuckian
May 2016
#44
I'm against superdelegates in general and especially lobbyists being superdelegates
A Little Weird
May 2016
#43
Someone running for the office of the presidency should definitely not be a superdelegate
A Little Weird
May 2016
#57
It certasinly does not disqualify them as voters. It disqualifies them as potential
eridani
May 2016
#24
Because a filmmaker should probably be able to release a documentary about a candidate during an
Recursion
May 2016
#28
You're saying she was corrupted by the LGBT advocacy groups she's worked for?
Recursion
May 2016
#35
I am saying tht salaried lobbyists should have no more influence than their individual vote n/t
eridani
May 2016
#36
No one who gets paid to influence the political process, regardless of actual profession. n/t
eridani
May 2016
#38
Why should your vote be equal to theirs? They literally do the work of the party
Recursion
May 2016
#77
My neighborhood has a lobbyist, he helped sort through Gov. grants & we got a new road.
Sunlei
May 2016
#7
several million dollars of stimulus money, couple years of road projects/plans and 'jobs'.
Sunlei
May 2016
#76
I don't like Corporations intruding into our electoral process by gaining voting rights. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#26