Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,751 posts)
45. Results of the Democratic primaries in 1968
Sat May 14, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

LBJ dropped out after barely defeating McCarthy in New Hampshire

RFK was likely to be the Democratic nominee had he not been murdered the evening he won the California primary.

Wallace did not run as a Democrat in 1968 but had run as a Democrat in 1964.

Not all states has primaries or caucuses as today.

I went to rallies for McCarthy, Humphrey, and Wallace in San Francisco. By fortuitous circumstances I got to meet McCarthy as I stayed in hotel with his entourage. At the Humphrey rally, long hairs / anti-war protesters were sorted and not allowed into the rally itself. I went to the Wallace rally on a high school, field trip and their were more protestors than supporters and Wallace seemed to like the interchange with those who mocked. RFK was not on the ballot in early primaries. Smathers and Young were favorite sons in Ohio and Florida.

Hubert Humphrey won a brokered convention in Chicago. Note there were only 13 states with primaries.

At the moment of Kennedy's death, the delegate totals were:
Hubert Humphrey 561
Robert Kennedy 393
Eugene McCarthy 258


Candidate Primaries Won Popular Vote % of Vote

McCarthy 6 2,914,933 37.3%

RF Kennedy 1 2,305,148 30,6%

Stephen Young 1 549,140 7.3%

LB Johnson 1 383,590 5.1%

George Smathers 1 236,242 3.1%

Hubert Humphrey 0 166,463 2.2%

The Final Ballot


Presidential tally

Hubert Humphrey 1759.25

Eugene McCarthy 601

Not Voting 604.25

Vice Presidential tally:

Edmund S. Muskie 1942.5

George S. McGovern 146.5

Julian Bond 48.5

Channing Phillips 67.5

David Hoeh 4

Daniel K. Moore 17.5

Edward M. Kennedy 12.75

Eugene McCarthy 3.0

Paul E. "Bear" Bryant 1.5

Others 16.25

James H. Gray 0.5

George Wallace 0.5


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_1968

How undemocratic of you to suggest the idea. N/T Big Blue Marble May 2016 #1
I am not SUGGESTING the idea. I have seen it mentioned as a possibility. That is why I am asking Seeinghope May 2016 #3
"Seen it mentioned?" Where? No Democrats--unless they were real mendacious--would suggest such MADem May 2016 #9
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA JonLeibowitz May 2016 #40
You didn't think that was snark? I did. It was a smackdown to the laundry list provided MADem May 2016 #58
It was absolutely not snark. The others on the comment thread were shocked and Kos never clarified. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #67
It was a snarky answer to that piece I bolded. Anyone seeing it as anything other than MADem May 2016 #69
No, not a wishing-and-hoping complex -- I just know how to read. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #72
Don't put words in my mouth--it never works well. MADem May 2016 #73
Nonsense post; I was just holding you to your characterization of Kos. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #75
I'm not invested in "Kos" at all. From what I know of him, he was a Republican before MADem May 2016 #77
Thats what a lot of people have said is their plan. Baobab May 2016 #97
Well, someone on the internet said it Dem2 May 2016 #92
Markos is not just "someone on the internet", at all. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #102
Mentioned everywhere including 840high May 2016 #44
Our mutual friend has left the conversation, after post #40. Pity... JonLeibowitz May 2016 #46
I have a life. I took an old lady to the grocery store--can't you find something to do if MADem May 2016 #60
ageism - lady would have sufficed. 840high May 2016 #63
No--she was an OLD lady. It's "ageism" to find something "wrong" with being OLD. MADem May 2016 #65
Heehee - I am 77 - 840high May 2016 #79
If you are, you should know better. nt MADem May 2016 #88
Actually I posted that to show 840high May 2016 #95
Silly, you say? These are YOUR people writing this garbage: MADem May 2016 #105
I love my people. Relax. 840high May 2016 #106
Your dismissive "relax" is the ultimate in condescension. MADem May 2016 #107
We won't forget either. If Bernie 840high May 2016 #108
He won't be, you'll either have to hold your horses, or leave. nt MADem May 2016 #109
And you have links? Not out-of-context from KOS, but real links, that aren't MADem May 2016 #59
How do you know if they are "REAL" liberals? Perogie May 2016 #54
Because no "REAL" liberal would turn the country over to Trump, no matter what. MADem May 2016 #56
You know, Hillary will " Break the Wheel". FarPoint May 2016 #20
Are you angling Aerows May 2016 #53
No, Hillary has done the "walk of shame", and will wreak vengeance ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #70
I'd also love to see this site try to enforce party loyalty in that case. HA! Good luck. reformist2 May 2016 #25
You would? I can guar-an-TEE you, you will see just that. nt MADem May 2016 #61
I Have Met And Spoken W/ Biden For More Than 30 Minutes Once... Good Used Car Salesman! CorporatistNation May 2016 #112
It may be undemocratic, but it's precisely what Barney Frank & the Rules Committee will end up doing leveymg May 2016 #51
I think Biden will come out of the convention as the candidate. Peregrine Took May 2016 #2
If she's indicted and her poll numbers are plummeting, they might go Biden. Obama would back it. EndElectoral May 2016 #4
She will not be indicted. apcalc May 2016 #78
How would that happen? Seeinghope May 2016 #5
Supers cast their votes for Biden SheenaR May 2016 #36
If that were the backup plan, the supers would not now be signalling that Sanders karynnj May 2016 #96
I was asked how it could happen SheenaR May 2016 #99
If Biden is not on the first ballot, there won't be a second ballot. thesquanderer May 2016 #111
My understanding SheenaR May 2016 #116
Although not literally "names on a ballot" (since there is no ballot per se), my understanding is... thesquanderer May 2016 #117
I have been saying that Biden will be plan B for awhile now. NWCorona May 2016 #6
Joe Biden couldn't get into double digits in the TWO TIMES he ran for POTUS. MADem May 2016 #14
The Crystal Ball is alive and well...accurate? libdem4life May 2016 #30
This entire thread is an exercise in WISHING ILL. MADem May 2016 #68
No, sorry. False Premise. Hoping for clarity and honesty and the light of day libdem4life May 2016 #80
LOL! Sure! nt MADem May 2016 #81
No Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #7
If they did that then that would be "Seppaku" - they would rather have a 100% chance of losing to Baobab May 2016 #98
I think the DNC will do whatever they want. HooptieWagon May 2016 #8
Bingo. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #48
Hillary has the power to release her delegates to someone else as she did in 2008, Thinkingabout May 2016 #10
Did either of them get to double digits in the primary? libdem4life May 2016 #33
Replacing her with Biden would prove the DNC is more invested in stopping Bernie than Trump whatchamacallit May 2016 #11
Bernie is stopping himself. He doesn't have enough delegates. MADem May 2016 #21
No you are not addressing the issue here... ljm2002 May 2016 #71
What would they do? They'd watch pigs fly while they sing Fitzmas songs! MADem May 2016 #82
Ridiculous. Cue X Files theme redstateblues May 2016 #39
I wonder also what would Sanders do with his delegates should he be indicted for Thinkingabout May 2016 #12
She's received the same letters from the FEC. Fawke Em May 2016 #17
No she has not--see post 23, last sentence in the message text. nt MADem May 2016 #24
Source of that accusation? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #19
This is just one source, there are many others. It's a well-covered story. MADem May 2016 #23
Here's some cold water to throw on "just one of many" bogus claims you think to make... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #29
Waah-I hate the source, so let me gish-gallop but not prove it wrong!!! MADem May 2016 #87
The campaign that is in debt is Clinton's MrMickeysMom May 2016 #89
You're the table pounder--don't like the source/change the subject! MADem May 2016 #90
Yeah... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #91
I don't think you can force your delegates to vote for someone else. Fawke Em May 2016 #13
If Hill is bumped, her delegates are automatically free larkrake May 2016 #37
And wouldn't that be just terrific? SheilaT May 2016 #15
Defeated and demoralized is how Establishment wants us. Jackilope May 2016 #76
Sloganeer Jo will lose to Trump yourpaljoey May 2016 #16
In that situation, picking anyone but Bernie would destroy the party. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #18
The whole world's watching! longship May 2016 #22
and that was BEFORE the militarization of most police departments corkhead May 2016 #35
It's actually important to SheilaT May 2016 #100
Some democracy we have going in this country, huh? bjo59 May 2016 #26
If the indictment came AFTER the convention CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #27
they pulled that stunt in '68 and we ended up with Nixon corkhead May 2016 #28
RFK was murdered in 1968 and we ended up with Nixon. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #43
yes, but they ignored the candidate who came into the convention with the most delegates corkhead May 2016 #85
Did you see post #45 in this thread? Re:1968 PufPuf23 May 2016 #86
Thanks for this, I had a misunderstanding of Humphrey's participation prior to the convention. corkhead May 2016 #93
I would think the other candidate would be the next guy. apnu May 2016 #31
yes,or anyone else, but that person will have to get more votes than Sanders larkrake May 2016 #32
You know, there are plenty of other sites that cater to various fantasies. You don't need DU. randome May 2016 #34
They have to go where Karl assigns them. nt Andy823 May 2016 #52
Isn't Hillary seeking out some of the same donors karl's guys use? timmymoff May 2016 #94
Legally? Maybe firebrand80 May 2016 #38
The Rs would then loop video of Bernie promising to raise taxes on the middle class redstateblues May 2016 #42
First of all, Hillary is not going to be indicted. She is going to be nominated and then elected StevieM May 2016 #41
Results of the Democratic primaries in 1968 PufPuf23 May 2016 #45
Yes, either Biden or some other Democrat of similar stature. beaglelover May 2016 #47
Thread #4837557 hoping for the Indictment Fairy. NuclearDem May 2016 #49
No, they couldn't "Just replace her with Biden" but the Convention has a process that could result stevenleser May 2016 #50
The convention could nominate him, but there would be serious merrily May 2016 #55
In 72, rogerashton May 2016 #57
He wasn't appointed. SheilaT May 2016 #101
Reference: 1968 Democratic convention - do the google. Kip Humphrey May 2016 #62
Biden would lose AgingAmerican May 2016 #64
Electing a female president seems like somewhat of a priority ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #66
Oh gawd, don't. Just don't. ebayfool May 2016 #74
Bernie Lost. Time to get over it. n/t Lil Missy May 2016 #83
Al Franken hollowdweller May 2016 #84
Hell won't break loose. Joe would be a great candidate and would demolish Trump. I would be 100% Joe the Revelator May 2016 #103
Why do you think they want Bernie out so bad? notadmblnd May 2016 #104
That's my thought too.. HughLefty1 May 2016 #110
They want him out because he NorthCarolina May 2016 #113
Exactly, the establishment and the status quo must be maintained notadmblnd May 2016 #114
.that^ 840high May 2016 #115
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Hillary is indicted an...»Reply #45