Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
FactCheck says you're wrong. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #1
...... Florencenj2point0 May 2016 #3
And this poster knows that, yet is till posting lies! Also claiming trade deals killed SCHIP when bettyellen May 2016 #5
The rules are very complicated but they include a "standstill" on new finacial services Baobab May 2016 #12
CHIP is an ongoing program that has been expanded in the years past your citations. Period. bettyellen May 2016 #13
But in 1994-1995 Biil Clinton signed GATS, and GATS threatens SCHIP, Medicare and Medicaid Baobab May 2016 #46
Here is some really good, informative proof, everybody please read this Baobab May 2016 #43
Wait, I thought lobbyists were bad? Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #55
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #51
If Clinton was agin it, why did he sign it into law in 1997? Hoyt May 2016 #2
Maybe because the Understanding on Committment in Financial Services was right around the corner Baobab May 2016 #14
More likely, it is the best health care reform they could get at the time -- for children. Hoyt May 2016 #27
Hoyt, this is your golden opportunity, what is good about GATS? Baobab May 2016 #29
Why are you and perhaps a few others seemingly the only persons who see my posts about trade deals. Baobab May 2016 #30
No one understands your posts about GATS, nor does anyone believe a law passed in the 1990s will Hoyt May 2016 #33
You're trying to portray me as some kind of outlier but the fact is, these deals are opposed Baobab May 2016 #34
Not trying to portray you as anything. You asked my opinion why no one reads your posts on GATS. Hoyt May 2016 #36
Hoyt, I was talking about robots. About our creating new life Baobab May 2016 #40
Hillary created SCHIP Florencenj2point0 May 2016 #4
She created it with some help? Evidence please. nt vintx May 2016 #8
What the Hillary supporters mean by that is that at one point Hillary must have said she was strong pdsimdars May 2016 #32
What amounts to a global war on children's health for big corpos began under Clints Baobab May 2016 #25
CHIP still exists and has been EXPANDED despite your eight year old link saying it is doomed. OP is bettyellen May 2016 #6
Thats not what Nick Skalas's paper says - READ IT. Why are you so afraid of it? Baobab May 2016 #18
Why are you arguing CHIP is not successful or has been expanded? Facts are stubborn things. bettyellen May 2016 #22
If you can find the Baucus hearings from 2009, buried in there there are some very imteresting Baobab May 2016 #35
There are dozens of Finance committee hearings on health care karynnj May 2016 #60
This article supports your recollection: vintx May 2016 #7
Kennedy gave her a whole lot of credit for CHIP, until he was backing Obama after which he soft bettyellen May 2016 #16
Post the citations vintx May 2016 #17
"program wouldn’t be in existence today if we didn’t have Hillary pushing for it " EM Kennedy bettyellen May 2016 #19
They did say in their article that it was politics that caused the lack of support in the first go vintx May 2016 #24
I'm not taking Orrin Hatch or Mc Caine's words over Kennedy or HRC's. YMMV. bettyellen May 2016 #26
Ive attempted to explain GATS a number of times-its a global agenda Baobab May 2016 #37
Nope, CHIP and minimum wage are here to stay.... bettyellen May 2016 #47
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #48
Minimum wage will be increased in a year as long as Trump does not win. The crap you post is not bettyellen May 2016 #49
They were pushing GATS, which literally eliminates the rights to health and education for corporatio Baobab May 2016 #28
He always gave her credit for supporting it karynnj May 2016 #61
Im surprised Factcheck would not clarify that too, but thanks for the fuller explanation. bettyellen May 2016 #62
A good book by a Kennedy aide, Nick Littlefield, gives a lot of back story karynnj May 2016 #63
Arrant nonsense. Sparkly May 2016 #9
The trade policy picture is complicated. Which is shown by this document from Maine. Baobab May 2016 #21
Paraphrase it for me, please? Sparkly May 2016 #52
'Medicare for All "will NEVER come to pass".' dchill May 2016 #10
Get the quote right. Sparkly May 2016 #11
Thanks. dchill May 2016 #15
"program wouldn’t be in existence today if we didn’t have Hillary pushing for it" -Edward Kennedy bettyellen May 2016 #20
It does if you read the words. Sparkly May 2016 #53
No, you THINK it does. dchill May 2016 #57
You "remember this" but can;t find a single citation to back up her "opposition". Shame on you. bettyellen May 2016 #23
Countries cannot propose or maintain any law or policy that is inconsistent with the FTA Baobab May 2016 #39
Would imply? It is not happening. And not going to, all these years later. bettyellen May 2016 #44
This shows what I am talking about, if you look at page 7 Baobab May 2016 #45
They have been pretty much on the wrong side of everything. pdsimdars May 2016 #31
It is not true Demsrule86 May 2016 #42
k&r nt bananas May 2016 #38
Why lie? Demsrule86 May 2016 #41
In fact if you read about teh GATS trade deal in 1994, you'll see that it conflicts with SCHIP Baobab May 2016 #50
A wall of blue links doesn't change the fact that CHIP/SCHIP have been increased, not decreased Recursion May 2016 #58
That is lame completely lame Demsrule86 May 2016 #59
It's all he has. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #56
Orwellian disinformation ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #54
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Clinton Administratio...»Reply #9