Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(47,141 posts)
36. By all means keep digging, here's some bedtime reading for you
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:21 PM
May 2016

Justice Department: “State Department employees may delete messages they deem in their own discretion to be personal.” “Second, because personal records are not subject to FOIA, and State Department employees may delete messages they deem in their own discretion to be personal, Plaintiff ’s preservation argument reduces to an unsupported allegation that former Secretary Clinton might have mistakenly or intentionally deleted responsive agency records rather than personal records. But Plaintiff offers no support for such a theory, and government agencies are not required to take steps to recover deleted material based on unfounded speculation that responsive information had been deleted.” [Justice Department Filing, Case 1:12-cv-02034-RBW, 9/9/15]

Department of Justice lawyers ruled Hillary Clinton “had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision.” “In the most complete legal defense of Mrs. Clinton, Justice Department lawyers insisted they not only have no obligation, but no power, to go back and demand the former top diplomat turn over any documents she hasn’t already given — and neither, they said, can the court order that. The defense came as part of a legal filing telling a judge why the administration shouldn’t be required to order Mrs. Clinton and her top aides to preserve all of their emails. ‘There is no question that Secretary Clinton had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision — she appropriately could have done so even if she were working on a government server,’ the administration lawyers argued. ‘Under policies issued by both the National Archives and Records Administration (‘NARA’) and the State Department, individual officers and employees are permitted and expected to exercise judgment to determine what constitutes a federal record.’” [Washington Times, 9/10/15]


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512049738

Head in the sand? Zen Democrat May 2016 #1
Warning, you'll be inundated with reality. pinebox May 2016 #2
No one is forced to spend time here. notadmblnd May 2016 #3
Yeah, you'll prolly want to take the day off... too much truth tends to leave painful marks. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #4
She and every SoS in the digital age got slapped on the wrist. Big deal. Hoyt May 2016 #5
Did they run for president afterward? AgingAmerican May 2016 #6
The State IG may have just slapped a wrist. The FBI and DOJ have yet to announce their findings morningfog May 2016 #10
Some more than others. NWCorona May 2016 #11
Did "every SOS in the digital age" have a private server in their home basement? nt m-lekktor May 2016 #16
"will" Dem2 May 2016 #7
Desperate times call for tedious hysterical posts. She's fine. Proud to support her in the GE! Beausoir May 2016 #8
She couldn't handle a basic responsibility of being SoS shawn703 May 2016 #9
Ignoring this doesn't change how potentially damaging it is. cali May 2016 #12
They all did it inchhigh May 2016 #13
Are Rice and Kerry currently running for POTUS? Joe the Revelator May 2016 #14
I agree inchhigh May 2016 #17
Very Balanced. /sarcasm BootinUp May 2016 #15
Are you suggesting that the Democratically appointed State Dept is now part of the conspiracy? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #26
I'm suggesting Clinton once again is held to a different standard, BootinUp May 2016 #27
It isn't a different standard, it is two different situations. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #28
By law she is permitted determine what to delete, thats why she didn't break any law. nt BootinUp May 2016 #29
That isn't the case at all Matt_in_STL May 2016 #34
By all means keep digging, here's some bedtime reading for you BootinUp May 2016 #36
Did you read what you posted? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #40
zzzz..... BootinUp May 2016 #41
Ignoring unfavorable information, thinking it will go away, tabasco May 2016 #18
Ignoring Sensationalistic Reporting is Bliss. nt BootinUp May 2016 #19
Harping on unfavorable information, hoping it will make things worse DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #21
Tell the corporate media. tabasco May 2016 #22
One of the things I hate is artifice so I will be transparent. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #23
Makes one long for the good ol' days when it was post after post about chairs.. frylock May 2016 #20
Like that time Bernie invited himself to the Pope's. Octafish May 2016 #38
Darn tootin. Let's just nominate a candidate who will lose. NightWatcher May 2016 #24
The people voted and he lost. Deal with it! DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #30
And we'll all have to deal with President Trump when Hillary loses NightWatcher May 2016 #33
Bill Clinton did it twice but hope springs eternal. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #35
Just don't open them. Beacool May 2016 #25
Absolutely... asuhornets May 2016 #31
The clapping is almost deafening today Tarc May 2016 #32
They don't understand that this is form a media matters article back in March... Demsrule86 May 2016 #37
Let this republican-generated smear run its course. Wake me up when the voters have realmirage May 2016 #39
Yet I've seen nothing about HRC winning Washington... CBHagman May 2016 #42
She shouldn't have done it. If she had done the right thing, nc4bo May 2016 #43
There is no Clinton email posts Commander Keen May 2016 #44
kick BootinUp May 2016 #45
kick BootinUp May 2016 #46
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Warning: We will now be i...»Reply #36