Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Warning: We will now be inundated with Clinton Email posts [View all]CBHagman
(16,984 posts)42. Yet I've seen nothing about HRC winning Washington...
...and B.S. getting the lion's share of delegates.
For those who haven't heard/seen coverage of that, here's the summary:
[url]http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2016/05/trump_clinton_win_washington_s.html[/url]
Clinton's win might give her some momentum, but it won't get her any delegates. There were no delegates at stake in the Democratic primary. Washington Democrats already awarded their delegates based on party caucuses.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders won Washington's caucuses in March, getting 74 delegates. Clinton got 27.
Republicans in Washington will allocate all 44 delegates to their national convention based on the primary results.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, you'll prolly want to take the day off... too much truth tends to leave painful marks.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#4
The State IG may have just slapped a wrist. The FBI and DOJ have yet to announce their findings
morningfog
May 2016
#10
Did "every SOS in the digital age" have a private server in their home basement? nt
m-lekktor
May 2016
#16
Desperate times call for tedious hysterical posts. She's fine. Proud to support her in the GE!
Beausoir
May 2016
#8
Are you suggesting that the Democratically appointed State Dept is now part of the conspiracy?
Matt_in_STL
May 2016
#26
By law she is permitted determine what to delete, thats why she didn't break any law. nt
BootinUp
May 2016
#29
Harping on unfavorable information, hoping it will make things worse
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#21
Makes one long for the good ol' days when it was post after post about chairs..
frylock
May 2016
#20
They don't understand that this is form a media matters article back in March...
Demsrule86
May 2016
#37
Let this republican-generated smear run its course. Wake me up when the voters have
realmirage
May 2016
#39