Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Maddow's shameful lies last night [View all] lagomorph777 May 2016 OP
Berners just love dumb beaurocratic rules and red tape, don't they? Almost like a fetish. YouDig May 2016 #1
Wow. Of all the lame hilly fan posts defending your dear leader, this is the weakest. cali May 2016 #3
She didn't file her TPS reports. Outrage! YouDig May 2016 #7
Didn't you get that memo? realmirage May 2016 #106
TPS haha! jzodda May 2016 #111
I can't stand the enabling. it will be sweet when the fbi is done. roguevalley May 2016 #123
Jury voted to leave. merrily May 2016 #25
Oh, we're back to the alert wars? lagomorph777 May 2016 #28
When did they stop? merrily May 2016 #95
What??? North Korea? Lol cali May 2016 #43
Wow, "red-tape" "bureaucratic rules"...to protect the lives of American agents lagomorph777 May 2016 #9
No American agents' lives were put at risk because she didn't file her TPS reports. YouDig May 2016 #13
Newsweek: Hillary Clinton and Her Staff may have Compromised Counterterrorism Ops with 'Sloppy' Com. w4rma May 2016 #131
Exactly. Sounds like the policies -- not law -- were burdensome. My company has policies I work Hoyt May 2016 #10
A-henh. mac56 May 2016 #84
You do know that she's asking to run this bureaucracy, right? lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #97
I thought you people said Carni May 2016 #112
Good point. Berners care about irrelevant red tape, but when it comes to an election, YouDig May 2016 #113
On a thread defending Hillary's "rule breaking" Carni May 2016 #116
well...succinct and pointed. Good job! n/t Sheepshank May 2016 #121
Yeah! Those stupid laws and rules and regulations, who needs em! AgingAmerican May 2016 #114
Hey look... Buddyblazon May 2016 #120
Rules "don't apply" to royalty, do they? (nt) w4rma May 2016 #130
Rachel Maddow is the sharpest researcher on television, hands down. Trust Buster May 2016 #2
Gotta love Rachel! workinclasszero May 2016 #4
And, last night she was especially brilliant (not to mention LOL funny). Surya Gayatri May 2016 #87
I watched her once many years ago. I was not impressed. cali May 2016 #5
Well you like Bernie so... Demsrule86 May 2016 #18
Why yes, I like my Senator. Along with 85% of the voters in my state cali May 2016 #34
Apparently a lot of Sanders supporters believe she's in the tank for Hilly CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #60
I don't watch her so I couldn't tell you. cali May 2016 #68
Holy smokes. Duval May 2016 #104
I was a big fan for years while she was on the radio. She was progressive. Then she moved to rhett o rick May 2016 #133
Doubt if she'd be impressed... CherokeeDem May 2016 #58
Her show and Talking Points Memo inchhigh May 2016 #66
i'm with you barbtries May 2016 #99
This. Smartest person on TV, and one of the smartest pundits anywhere. YouDig May 2016 #6
Yep. nc4bo May 2016 #8
Well that would make her incapable of lying, right? JackRiddler May 2016 #44
It's the only news show I watch these days. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #103
I never cared for that format/approach she presented 2banon May 2016 #118
I didn't know she had a candidate... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #134
Same here, it's totally why I'm not a regular listener of Amy Goodman anymore, in fact not for years 2banon May 2016 #138
Rachel did a great job on this issue last night Gothmog May 2016 #119
Too bad she sold her soul for gold like others we know. rhett o rick May 2016 #132
The sheer number of good liberals who have been attacked sufrommich May 2016 #11
Good liberals do not tell massive lies. lagomorph777 May 2016 #12
She told the truth Demsrule86 May 2016 #19
Isn't it amazing... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #135
pales next to the number of hacks exposed for what they are reddread May 2016 #14
the sheer number of good liberals who have been attacked, vilified mountain grammy May 2016 #23
I agree. If a media personality says anything that a Sanders supporter doesn't agree with, then Trust Buster May 2016 #36
Only media personalities are good liberals. JackRiddler May 2016 #47
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #79
And they replaced them all with Joe Scabb. JoePhilly May 2016 #91
When I think of Goodall, Lewis etc, their obvious unfounded, misdirected hatred is quite putrid. Sheepshank May 2016 #122
Every word was true Demsrule86 May 2016 #15
Nobody else had a server in their house pinebox May 2016 #38
Same old distraction, ignore the server being at home in a closet, claim others did it. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #46
Your statement is misleading angrychair May 2016 #41
Truly shocking the gargantuan fall in integrity Maddow has suffered this primary. stillwaiting May 2016 #16
Me too. lagomorph777 May 2016 #20
Everyone who dislikes Demsrule86 May 2016 #24
Please do tell of his lack of integrity..... peace13 May 2016 #59
You should get rid of your sig line. Fawke Em May 2016 #73
Or at least put a sarcasm smiley behind it. progressoid May 2016 #124
Perhaps she just really, really likes her job and desires to keep it. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #74
Amazing what money can buy, huh? nt valerief May 2016 #94
She threw her journalistic integrity out the window. reformist2 May 2016 #140
I feel the same. Enthusiast May 2016 #144
Nobody gives a shit about it except Bernie folks upaloopa May 2016 #17
Ah, you have so little faith in the voters of CA, MT, NJ, SD, ND, and DC lagomorph777 May 2016 #22
Bernie is the one trying to dismiss the votes Demsrule86 May 2016 #27
It is the top news story. cali May 2016 #37
Speaking of denial! JackRiddler May 2016 #48
And only Camp Weathervane gives a shit about that sellout Maddow. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #52
As Bernie said nobody cares about the damn emails. Thinkingabout May 2016 #21
Bernie is magnanimous. lagomorph777 May 2016 #26
The shameful lies, Rachal under the bus, she has destroyed the CT. Thinkingabout May 2016 #31
Don't worry, there will be another one soon to take its place. randome May 2016 #33
Yes, we know CT's has a purpose, makes the truth really welcome. Thinkingabout May 2016 #39
so what was the lie? DrDan May 2016 #29
No, not merely a lie of omission (still a lie) but a lie of comission. lagomorph777 May 2016 #32
I still do not see a lie in the OP DrDan May 2016 #83
Then your shell of denial is too thick to penetrate lagomorph777 May 2016 #107
look - I tried to be respectful - no personal insults DrDan May 2016 #108
OK, please read this lagomorph777 May 2016 #109
Sanders supporters have quickly become Clintons best asset in the primary. NCTraveler May 2016 #30
And completely ignoring the fact eggman67 May 2016 #35
You are the eggman! lagomorph777 May 2016 #40
Exactly. onecaliberal May 2016 #45
FOIA is to make sure that all government records are public property MisterP May 2016 #49
And her fans here are oblivious to the fact that although Bernie has been nice vintx May 2016 #86
Goo goo g'joob ;) n/t eggman67 May 2016 #100
Doesn't matter. tazkcmo May 2016 #42
I blocked two 'Nobody Cares' posters yesterday Trajan May 2016 #53
Nice! Dem2 May 2016 #50
Impenetrable wall of denial; fact-free zone lagomorph777 May 2016 #54
It's nice to see people who I don't actually know much about rooting for our side to lose Dem2 May 2016 #56
I am rooting for a Democrat to win lagomorph777 May 2016 #61
Logical fallacies are b******* Dem2 May 2016 #90
I am amused that the Sanders people are throwing Rachel Maddow under the bus Gothmog May 2016 #51
Okay, got it: you approve of lying sellouts. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #55
I stand with Rachel Maddow Gothmog May 2016 #71
She's been sitting next to Brian Williams too long. CrispyQ May 2016 #57
And seriously...look at him. peace13 May 2016 #65
Try not to hurt yourselves with sll this outrage. hrmjustin May 2016 #62
My outrage isn't hurting anybody. lagomorph777 May 2016 #63
Don't you worry. hrmjustin May 2016 #64
Not in the GE. lagomorph777 May 2016 #69
Too bad your candidate didn't have the depth of support you wish he had. hrmjustin May 2016 #77
Maddow will be a lot of fun to watch as she eats her crow. gordianot May 2016 #67
I often wonder how she would report on a Bernie GE run. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #75
I haven't been able to watch her for months. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #70
Stick a fork in it, Maddow is done. Baitball Blogger May 2016 #72
I'll stick with Maddow and her well-researched opinions. n/t Lil Missy May 2016 #76
What was really funny was how Lawrence O'Donnell debunked 2cannan May 2016 #78
I did notice that. lagomorph777 May 2016 #80
But Hillary shouldn't have to follow the rules! Silver_Witch May 2016 #81
It's impossible not to hear Valley Girl inflections when I read this lagomorph777 May 2016 #82
her candidate is threatened so she will say whatever it takes dana_b May 2016 #85
Post reads pretty much like a fox news report The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #88
I sat through that meandering 10 minute intro about Clint Eastwood's chair only to find out corkhead May 2016 #89
Like her banker pals, Hillary is too big to fail or jail. nt JEB May 2016 #92
Rachel Maddow is a con artist Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #93
Her reputation is in the toilet. n/t Skwmom May 2016 #96
Hillary is the victim of her own bad judgements. B Calm May 2016 #98
Rachel Maddow did a great job on this issue last night Gothmog May 2016 #101
Rachel is a great way of cutting through bullshit and getting to the point. Bravo. MariaThinks May 2016 #102
Her flagrant disregard for security concerns is far worse than exposing the secrets cpwm17 May 2016 #125
TRMS deathrind May 2016 #105
Stick a fork in her. 1/2 of the liberals are done with her propaganda. jillan May 2016 #110
More excuses for HRC. Is she entitled to flout the rules others are required to follow? EndElectoral May 2016 #115
I only watch talking heads in the morning now d_legendary1 May 2016 #117
Rachel always gets giddy and excited when defending HRC left-of-center2012 May 2016 #126
Not only that, the SD had 3 methods that were listed in the IG Report Press Virginia May 2016 #127
Oh, my gosh Art_from_Ark May 2016 #136
Maybe. Certainly they could work on retaining her emails in Press Virginia May 2016 #137
those were HER(Maddows) emails MFM008 May 2016 #128
Rachel wants to be HRC's press secretary so bad she can taste it DebbieCDC May 2016 #129
Maddow shocked me Thurs night too grasswire May 2016 #139
I guess Money is enough to gamble your Integrity on a Clinton screw-up Sky Masterson May 2016 #142
rachel's attempt to 'splain for hillary hopemountain May 2016 #141
It's Rachel. She used to be good. Enthusiast May 2016 #143
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maddow's shameful lies la...»Reply #77