2016 Postmortem

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)

64. The Purity Police are in the house.

Reply to onenote (Reply #47)

Sun May 29, 2016, 02:53 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For those who are supposedly so worried about a trump presidency. [View all] onecaliberal May 2016 OP

What is it about mr trump you find so appealing? The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #1

Um, that would be Bernie, actually. dchill May 2016 #3

His 46 inch waist? DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #42

So whats Hillary waist size? since you brought that up. bahrbearian May 2016 #68

I don't give a shit what Hillary's waist size is. Do you? DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #69

Wow, you need a Nap. bahrbearian May 2016 #70

Just got back from three hours at the gym. I couldn't feel more alive. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #71

Cool story Bro! bahrbearian May 2016 #72

Plato's ideal man was spiritually, physically, and intellectually at his peak DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #73

IT's good to set goals , even if you'll never obtain them. bahrbearian May 2016 #74

I usually exceed them. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #75

Another cool story. bahrbearian May 2016 #76

I am glad I continue to impress you. I can be your role model. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #80

At 1st I was impressed how tough you sounded, but now we are playing Rain deer games, bahrbearian May 2016 #81

Don't get lube on your Cheetos, just sayin, and certainly don't eat em after... DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #83

You sure have a thing about Lube, Very Telling. bahrbearian May 2016 #84

First mention of it. Try again, after wiping! Hit the mark on my first try, though. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #85

Fix your tag line Grandpa. Silver_Witch May 2016 #92

I was minding my own business and the guy made a wisecrack at my expense. I responded in kind. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #93

None of my business... Silver_Witch May 2016 #95

Thank you for pointing that out. At least someone read my sig line. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #96

She already can't beat him. dchill May 2016 #2

Exactly. onecaliberal May 2016 #4

A very, very steep downhill. dchill May 2016 #5

^That^ onecaliberal May 2016 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #19

. . . what your definition of "is" is? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #78

"steep downfall" made me think of something like this: LiberalElite May 2016 #31

He's actually competitive against her in some blue states as well. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #7

It's gotta be more than that. dchill May 2016 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #20

There is no other logical reason. There were many qualified candidates libdem4life May 2016 #59

But, but, but it's her turn. She's entiled to it. TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #8

And she's already wildly unpopular on our own side, and independents hate her. onecaliberal May 2016 #11

Troo dat. TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #12

national poll Thursday showed only 18% "honest and trustworthy".. grasswire May 2016 #17

They have been sticking their fingers in their ears and yelling "la-la-la, we can't hear you." Jackilope May 2016 #10

the way Hillary & surrogates treat Sanderistas, you'd think they were TRYING to elect Trump! cloudythescribbler May 2016 #13

well said, scribbler. nt grasswire May 2016 #18

Actually I think they are trying to hide the fact the progressives wing is the *larger wing silvershadow May 2016 #21

Good point. libdem4life May 2016 #63

Their "logic" if you can call it that dana_b May 2016 #44

What do you think of the primary system? 6chars May 2016 #14

I think lobbyists should not be, because I cannot be certain where their ultimate loyalties lie. silvershadow May 2016 #22

I know this will be a bitter lesson nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #37

It's going to be a disastrous day if Trump wins the Presidency. Then the riots, and I do mean riots YOHABLO May 2016 #15

I hope it doesn't happen. nt silvershadow May 2016 #23

then you should be encouraging people to do the one thing that will keep it from happening onenote May 2016 #32

We are in a primary. You're talking General election strategy. We aren't nearly there yet. nt silvershadow May 2016 #40

Why is it too early to encourage people to vote for the Democratic nominee onenote May 2016 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #48

You're the one that brought up the GE, not me. onenote May 2016 #86

The Purity Police are in the house. libdem4life May 2016 #64

I agree, worst thing that could possibly ever happen. So why keep running towards the cliff onecaliberal May 2016 #34

I started a thread with you and others posting in this thread in mind. Garrett78 May 2016 #16

Not to worry, the Dem party leaders have a plan for that ... Scuba May 2016 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #41

Yep, the cries of "Nader!" have already begun. Jester Messiah May 2016 #89

It's too late for this gollygee May 2016 #25

How does Trump win without women and minorities? sufrommich May 2016 #26

I've wondered the same thing. Garrett78 May 2016 #39

Angry white men are blind to POC and women. nt hack89 May 2016 #87

trump hasn't even touched the surface of his attacks on bernie . . . you should realize that DrDan May 2016 #27

we are supporting the only candidate that can beat trump...sanders would be mincemeat beachbum bob May 2016 #28

That's a shallow take on a layered electorate. saltpoint May 2016 #29

The person with the most delegates gets the nomination oberliner May 2016 #30

But we HAVE to nominate someone historic. MadDAsHell May 2016 #33

As long as the historic candidate has a lot more votes what's the problem? DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #46

I think the oligarchy played this perfectly. The dems nominate a corporatist candidate with Doctor_J May 2016 #35

yes - it really is brilliant dana_b May 2016 #45

Why do some of you think you are immune to a Trump Presidency. JoePhilly May 2016 #36

Why do you think we're immune to a Clinton presidency? Doctor_J May 2016 #38

Amen. nt silvershadow May 2016 #43

Because her peeps think the only people DLC policies hurt Hydra May 2016 #49

You'll do much better under Trump. JoePhilly May 2016 #62

Lol Hydra May 2016 #65

You'll do much better under Trump. JoePhilly May 2016 #60

^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars May 2016 #50

Nah. That would make FAR too much sense. Shadowflash May 2016 #51

You didn't warn us creeksneakers2 May 2016 #52

Poor little things. How dare we stand on principle for once instead of voting for a liar who onecaliberal May 2016 #91

Losers whine creeksneakers2 May 2016 #94

I didn't threaten anything. Like I said, comprehension problems. onecaliberal May 2016 #97

The people have voted and they have chosen Hillary as the nominee. It sounds like you think Super Metric System May 2016 #53

Hillary was chosen but not by the voters. And the math proves it -- 261 to 2. IdaBriggs May 2016 #55

Over 13 million PEOPLE have voted for her. You can write a book justifying otherwise, but reality Metric System May 2016 #56

And millions more have not. And polls consistently say they don't like her. IdaBriggs May 2016 #57

Using that logic, millions more have also NOT voted for Sanders. Metric System May 2016 #58

And millions didn't vote for Obama in the 2008 primary. That's what happens in a primary. Garrett78 May 2016 #61

Clinton only got where she is by the DNC... AmBlue May 2016 #98

A majority of Democrats have voted for Clinton and refused to vote for Sanders. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #54

EXACTLY. n/t Triana May 2016 #66

Or, if they are worried about Trump SCantiGOP May 2016 #67

Huh. And the 'liar' that everyone hates is beating Bernie pretty badly. bullimiami May 2016 #77

Which doesn't help her beat Trump. progressoid May 2016 #90

Political purity my Aunt Fanny. DinahMoeHum May 2016 #79

If they had real positions instead of those that blow in the wind..... nolabels May 2016 #82

relax oldandhappy May 2016 #88

Why do Bernie fans welcome a Trump presidency? workinclasszero May 2016 #99