"In 1997--three years after the Clinton health care plan was defeated..."

[Jarqui]

4. Well, this part is a little interesting in terms of linkage

US District Judge Royce Lamberth rebuked the administration for its “outrageous” and “reprehensible” deception concerning participants in the working groups, many of whom were private parties with a stake in the outcome.

“The executive branch of the Government, working in tandem, was dishonest with this court,’’ he wrote. “It is clear that the decisions here were made at the highest levels of Government.”

In 1993:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/837/454/2377066/

Lamberth had previously criticized Clinton et al.’s “preposterous,” “incomplete” and “inadequate” responses to the plaintiffs’ requests for relevant information, which had made the discovery process “difficult, drawn-out, and contentious.” He ruled the defendants had “improperly thwarted plaintiffs’ legitimate discovery requests” by raising “meritless” objections.

Judge Royce Lamberth is one of the judge's who recently agreed to Clinton SoS staff depositions in the FOIA cases:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/second-federal-judge-grants-legal-discovery-into-clinton-use-of-private-email-server/2016/03/29/4ca38de8-f5c6-11e5-8b23-538270a1ca31_story.html

and then there's this:
Report to the Chairman, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives
April 2001
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01446.pdf

This isn't the first time providing all the emails was a problem for the Clintons

and then there's this:
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?1997cv1288-359

"Mills’ totally inadequate performance of duty directly led to all the adverse criticism the White House suffered in this document production fiasco."

Judge Royce C. Lamberth, April 3, 2008.

Yep, that's the one and the same Cheryl Mills messing around with the production of Lewinsky emails, etc ... with findings and remarks by the same judge in 1993, 1997 and 2015-16

So history is repeating itself here and the Clintons think Americans are dumb enough to fall for it again ... and by the looks of the polls, they're right!

Meanwhile, the poor poster who raised this is a bum who will be banned June 16th for pointing it out.

Let me point this out: I think Americans and the good people at DU.com deserve better than Trump or Clinton. And another set of deceptions and lies that's been going on for 25 years from Hillary isn't going to change my mind.