HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » WaPo: Why would Bernie no... » Reply #13

Response to JonLeibowitz (Original post)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:13 PM

13. Is this real?


I mean shitloads of unions have fallen in line behind Clinton, despite many of their members wanting Bernie.

You'd think Clinton and the DNC would want shitloads on the platform committee.

Think about this: Lack of Retirement. Lack of Health Benefits. Sick Leave. Low Pay.

The government can mandate these things and make more programs to provide these.

However if we have a strong union movement then there is not any reason for gov't to be involved. Workers would be able to bargain and strike and get these things for themselves.

Maybe with the political process so corrupt the rich figure they can hold benefits to the workers at a lower level by buying the politicians, and letting the gov't provide them, rather than allowing us to have unions.

Sort of sad the dems are ok with it.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 OP
cyberpj Jun 2016 #1
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #2
JimDandy Jun 2016 #3
think Jun 2016 #4
djean111 Jun 2016 #5
AzDar Jun 2016 #6
NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #7
QC Jun 2016 #8
jwirr Jun 2016 #11
aikoaiko Jun 2016 #9
beltanefauve Jun 2016 #10
randome Jun 2016 #12
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #14
QC Jun 2016 #15
LineNew Reply Is this real?
hollowdweller Jun 2016 #13
cyberpj Jun 2016 #16
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #17
HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #18
JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #19
HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #20
Please login to view edit histories.