2016 Postmortem

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)

61. Evidently, you overlooked this link:

Reply to Nonhlanhla (Reply #56)

Thu Jun 2, 2016, 05:53 PM

Jun 2016

Sanders’ tax return: As ‘boring’ as promised

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton IT aide to plead Fifth in email case [View all] Jester Messiah Jun 2016 OP

Have we just identified the fall guy? n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #1

Nope. He is not responsible for the CONTENT. IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #2

I saw a theory that Hillary was setting him up for that... Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #3

FBI wouldn't have given him immunity.... HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #4

Immunity and pleading the Fifth don't go together, either. n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #5

There's different types of immunity. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #7

He plead the 5th in the civil case brought by Judicial Watch. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #10

Civil case, not criminal nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #28

Using protections guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution is not "shady" Tarc Jun 2016 #6

Yes. Even guilty parties have constitutional rights. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #9

No, surely not. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #11

Shady. Curious. Comical. Expected. It's all four. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #13

It's funny to see Sanders supporters, the alleged champions of free speech and equality Tarc Jun 2016 #14

Not quite sure what this has to do with free speech and equality. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #16

I am not surprised Tarc Jun 2016 #17

LOL I wouldn't expect you to be. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #24

If Hillary has nothing to hide... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #18

If Bernie has nothing to hide Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #20

A tax return is EXTREMELY TRIVIAL... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #22

If it's trivial, then why the secrecy? Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #39

Nothing nefarious about it??? Herman4747 Jun 2016 #40

Listen to yourself Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #43

Well, then... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #48

What a ridiculous demand Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #54

CONSIDER YOUR ARGUMENT ANNIHILATED... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #55

Oh, TIFFANY said there's a tax return? Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #56

Evidently, you overlooked this link: Herman4747 Jun 2016 #61

Those are his 2014 tax returns. nt. Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #62

Not surprising, given that the article was from April. Herman4747 Jun 2016 #63

This, from an article published a day later... Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #64

Hillary could simply release all her speech transcripts & destroy... Herman4747 Jun 2016 #65

Actually I don't care about Bernie's taxes Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #66

And you shouldn't care about Bernie's taxes!! This we do agree upon. Herman4747 Jun 2016 #67

At what point do we go into a different realm? Nonhlanhla Jun 2016 #68

Thank you for proving my point Tarc Jun 2016 #25

Hillary has pretty much EVERYTHING to hide. Optimism Jun 2016 #53

I guess we've moved away from "Cooperating fully with the investigation." Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #26

As well they should Tarc Jun 2016 #27

Because goevrnment is only accountable to citizens when they pass a partisan litmus test. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #29

You are free to get in bed with Judicial Watch if you like Tarc Jun 2016 #30

I refuse to get in bed with the corrupt. And it's not JW you're kicking at, it's the OIG. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #32

Suit yourself Tarc Jun 2016 #34

You abandon facts as quickly as Hillary abandoned the law. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #36

Emailgate is a tempest in a teapot that will not deliver the nomination to Bernie Tarc Jun 2016 #41

The OIG begs to differ. Trump is riding an anti-establishment wave. A Hillary nomination Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #42

Obviously the Democratic voters feel differently Tarc Jun 2016 #44

As long as only Democrats are allowed to vote in November you should be safe. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #45

We'll have the vast majority of the Bernie voters too Tarc Jun 2016 #46

Arrogance, condescension, secretive, dismissive and untrustworthy Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #47

What's he hiding? Octafish Jun 2016 #8

It appears... HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #12

You're the confusing the JudicialWatch civil case w the FBI investigation emulatorloo Jun 2016 #51

After he invoked the 5th before congress and after immunity morningfog Jun 2016 #59

Please note: This relates to the CIVIL case, not the FBI's CRIMINAL investigation. Fawke Em Jun 2016 #15

We know he spoke to them pursuant to immunity. morningfog Jun 2016 #60

He may want to protect his immunity in the FBI investigation... TCJ70 Jun 2016 #19

Again? randome Jun 2016 #21

Fifth of what Bourbon? Skink Jun 2016 #23

self-proclaimed "progressives" throw the Fifth Amendment under the bus onenote Jun 2016 #31

It's not that we think Pagliano's immunity is unacceptable. lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #38

I'm responding to suggestions that his taking the Fifth in a civil case against the State Dept onenote Jun 2016 #49

"shady" is sort of a vague term, lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #50

People are just frustrated because it means there were obviously crimes committed here SpareribSP Jun 2016 #52

No it doesn't onenote Jun 2016 #57

You are right SpareribSP Jun 2016 #58

I expected that. Others will as well. Perhaps even HRC. EndElectoral Jun 2016 #33

If Hillary pleads the Fifth, that will be devastating. She's stated she would talk to anyone anytime BillZBubb Jun 2016 #37

Smart move by Pagliano's attorneys. He's got criminal immunity from the FBI. That's all he needs. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #35