Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:07 PM Jun 2016

6/9 Reuters Emails in Clinton Probe Dealt with Planned Drone Strikes [View all]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Emails between U.S. diplomats in Islamabad and State Department officials in Washington about whether to challenge specific U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan are at the center of a criminal probe involving Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

The 2011 and 2012 emails were sent via the "low side" -government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters - as part of a secret arrangement that gave the State Department more of a voice in whether a CIA drone strike went ahead, according to congressional and law enforcement officials briefed on the FBI probe, the Journal said.

Some of the emails were then forwarded by Clinton's aides to her personal email account, which routed them to a server she kept at her home in suburban New York when she was secretary of state, the officials said, according to the newspaper.

snip

The emails were written within the often-narrow time frame in which State Department officials had to decide whether or not to object to drone strikes before the CIA pulled the trigger, the officials said, according to the Wall Street Journal.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This isn't relevant any more.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #1
I disagree, not matter how much unity is around, if this blows up... Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #12
Why wouldn't this post be allowed? panader0 Jun 2016 #17
The censorship is already ramping up. I can hardly believe it. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #22
So glad you clarified that for us all. Have you notified the FBI yet? That would pdsimdars Jun 2016 #21
This is DAMN relevant! Ignoring the importance is dangerous! pinebox Jun 2016 #29
It's relevant to the FBI. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #35
You need not wait for June 16 to support the Democratic cause. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #2
Your headlinne is incorrect. annavictorious Jun 2016 #3
I don't think we'll have to worry about more posts like this going forward Tarc Jun 2016 #4
DU was never a place where you couldn't discuss pertinent news. Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #13
Inflammatory grandstanding over fringe issues to savage a Democratic candidate Tarc Jun 2016 #15
The FBI investigation, even if you won't admit it, is not a fringe issue or grandstanding Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #16
*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP* Tarc Jun 2016 #20
Ignorant. Loudestlib Jun 2016 #27
You're on a Democratic website, promoting shite about the Democratic presidential Tarc Jun 2016 #28
Tarc, this is news, plain and simple pinebox Jun 2016 #30
We'll see how it flies on June 17th Tarc Jun 2016 #34
Agreed, context matters pinebox Jun 2016 #36
Which is why the OP didn't bother to provide a link. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #11
The OP has also been FFR'd. nt auntpurl Jun 2016 #24
OP also has 50,000 posts. pinebox Jun 2016 #31
"Reuters" sounds more legit Planot Jun 2016 #26
I don't know what to make of this. Barack_America Jun 2016 #5
The email fairy is retired. You didn't get the memo? YouDig Jun 2016 #6
Wait? The FBI quit their investigation? panader0 Jun 2016 #19
Clinton supporters don't want to know anything about her. senz Jun 2016 #7
Reporters asked a good question I didn't see reported elsewhere. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #8
*yawn* philosslayer Jun 2016 #9
I don't think the 16th is going to have any bearing on discussing new items relating to Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #14
A full fledged member of Princess Hillary's ostrich army. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #23
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #10
The most damning email was not about the program details, but about a NY times article jzodda Jun 2016 #18
Oh god, no. In this area of law, intent is not a factor. Neglegence is. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #25
You are wrong! jzodda Jun 2016 #33
Sooner or later you'll understand that you are wrong. This is one area of law that pdsimdars Jun 2016 #38
K&R pinebox Jun 2016 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»6/9 Reuters Emails in Cli...»Reply #0