Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Time's running out ... tick-tock! The countdown has begun ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #1
It's running out on your side too. Enjoy it while you can. And Lee Fang is NOT a rwer! jillan Jun 2016 #3
It's called push-back. Cut out the shitty attacks and smears on our party's candidate ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #5
You always contribute hostility. 840high Jun 2016 #9
Thank goodness she does not live in my state. I would be afraid to have someone so hostile be jillan Jun 2016 #10
heehee - I've thought the 840high Jun 2016 #20
Many members of the Democratic party would like to influence the Democratic party platform PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #55
A typically silly comment that ignores the substance of the post. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #32
It's an attempt to justify attacks and smears. This shit stops on June 16th. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #41
And it should stop on June 16. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #45
Do you believe that DUers should be helping them? Giving them a forum? NurseJackie Jun 2016 #48
If there is any truth to the charges raised here and elsewhere, guillaumeb Jun 2016 #53
This shit ends on the 16th. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #65
Such thoughtful introspection. libdem4life Jun 2016 #72
Ignore them on this site...and they are not posted so they can be refuted but as an attack Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #73
Your post "assumes" that you can determine my motivation. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #86
It is not that hard Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #89
Are you certain that you are responding to what I said, guillaumeb Jun 2016 #94
Giving them a forum? Are you kidding me? You think they are libdem4life Jun 2016 #75
Well put. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #87
Read the update, Nanc. This has zero to do with Clinton's 2008 PAC. Your later response tells me floriduck Jun 2016 #46
My name isn't Nanc. (Did you intend to reply to someone else?) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #49
So sorry Jackie. But my reply was definitely directed at you, not Nancy. Hope you found the floriduck Jun 2016 #78
You have until the 16th... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #82
Conservative Janet Parshall Glamrock Jun 2016 #67
One minute...wow...such reflexes. It is hubris that will do far libdem4life Jun 2016 #70
Lee Fang is one of the most progressive journalists out there. How can anyone call him a RWer? jillan Jun 2016 #2
Anyone who doesn't fawn over Hillary is part of the RW conspiracy. Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #4
Oh, now.. kadaholo Jun 2016 #6
And the new rules do not call for an echo chamber... Miles Archer Jun 2016 #57
Nah, it's more of Andy823 Jun 2016 #15
But nothing to say about the actual substance of the post? guillaumeb Jun 2016 #33
+ 1000 We've seen it here hundreds of times. senz Jun 2016 #21
As I understand it, ANY criticism of Hillary is a "right wing smear" and ANY site that djean111 Jun 2016 #12
THIS^^^^^^ THIS THIS ^^^THIS THIS^^^^ AntiBank Jun 2016 #19
^^^ Absolutely ^^^ senz Jun 2016 #22
Mother Jones, Huffington Post, The Young Turks... Miles Archer Jun 2016 #56
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #36
that time when Hillary was president bigtree Jun 2016 #7
But it's a libertarian one frazzled Jun 2016 #8
Exactly. randome Jun 2016 #37
We do have some people who don't like the Intercept because of Glen Greenwald. Autumn Jun 2016 #11
Greenwald? Really??? I don't always agree with him but how can any true Democrat not appreciate jillan Jun 2016 #14
Any more, for myself, "they" have moved to the right; I have not and will not. n/t djean111 Jun 2016 #31
What he said ^^^^ Old Codger Jun 2016 #51
I'll never understand homophobia. senz Jun 2016 #24
I find it somewhat amusing that your chosen link went to "Unofficial Sources" TwilightZone Jun 2016 #13
What? The link went to an article written by a journalist for the Intercept. jillan Jun 2016 #17
Look on the left side of the linked page. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #18
FOUR MORE DAYS DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #16
Yes, your cozy echo chamber awaits you. senz Jun 2016 #25
;-). I knew I could count on ya, dsb. ;-)) floriduck Jun 2016 #42
At least you can say I don't camouflage my true feelings. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #43
Nope. Make sure you read the child soldier article I was trying to link to. See my update. floriduck Jun 2016 #47
Yeah Folks at DU that don't agree with you should be PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #58
Thank you for misinterpreting what I said.. That seems to be the m.o. of you and your cohorts. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #59
You are the individual that posted folks should be "punched in the face". PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #60
Whether or not someone has been a Democrat since Thomas Jefferson's days is of no moment. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #62
Does my post #55 in this thread meet your approval? PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #63
It has nothing to do with my approval or disapproval. I have no delusions of grandeur. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #64
For Hillary Clinton to campaign, "There will be no waivers of the Child Soldier Protection Act" PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #66
Enjoy the echo chamber that's coming up. All Done Jun 2016 #76
It's not right-wing, but it has an agenda OKNancy Jun 2016 #23
The Intercept is anti corrupt establishment. senz Jun 2016 #27
LOL - but they love them some Putin/Russia.... OKNancy Jun 2016 #34
Many of the Bernie supporters now listen to a Russian radio station. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #74
Pretty soon we'll be allowed to only link to articles in Homes & Gardens and Car and Driver. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #26
There are greener pastures, my friend. senz Jun 2016 #28
I like pastures. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #29
Me too. senz Jun 2016 #30
The daily magic show continues even without the internet. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #38
Yep and it hits deeper, resonates on more levels. senz Jun 2016 #52
People can link to whatever they want, annavictorious Jun 2016 #35
It's a Libertarian publication... SidDithers Jun 2016 #39
Wasn't familiar with The Intercept at all, but that explaisn a lot. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #40
The RW conspiracy felix_numinous Jun 2016 #44
And, I am not the Tooth Fairy..... blue neen Jun 2016 #50
"Unofficial sources" Fox News "some people say" leftofcool Jun 2016 #54
KICK Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #61
I hope they will not be allowed. I woud hide them if I were on a jury. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #69
Let's try this one more time Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #68
Attacks from the left which do nothing but help Trump should also be banned. You should delete this. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #71
Relax 86. I am bringing up news about the Democratic presumptive nominee. She's not my choice floriduck Jun 2016 #77
You are attacking the Democratic nominee, and you won't fool anyone. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #80
you think this is so hillarious. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #81
Youll have this place all to yourself, come June 16th. Until then, I have just as much right to floriduck Jun 2016 #85
Well June 16th can't come soon enough. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #91
South Sudan is a Promising Tourist Destination On the Road Jun 2016 #79
Its scary how history taints a candidate swhisper1 Jun 2016 #83
After Thursday, any publication that publishes any criticism of Hillary, no matter how mild ... Scuba Jun 2016 #84
But that doesn't mean people hav e to stop posting material from those sources. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #88
Yes it is Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #90
Second guessing, revisionist horseshit that Darb Jun 2016 #92
It's a refreshing alternative to the paid for media MaeScott Jun 2016 #93
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Intercept is not a ri...»Reply #21